Many concerns have arisen from the planned economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) that is being negotiated between Taiwan and China; however, one of the largest ones is this: Why doesn’t President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) negotiate an ECFA with the US or Japan instead of rushing to conclude such an agreement with China?
Ma is doing all he can to tie the Taiwanese and Chinese economies closer to each other. By doing so, he has created a situation in which it seems as if Taiwanese businesses would be ruined if the country did not sign the economic pact with China. The implication is that by rejecting the agreement, the government would prohibit Taiwanese industries from accessing the Chinese market, and that would be too costly a consequence.
However, if Taiwan and China sign an ECFA, it is the general public that will be ruined instead. If that happens people will run the risk of losing their jobs. That puts Taiwan on the road to doom, regardless of whether an ECFA is signed or not. To solve this problem, Taiwan must find another way out so that it can escape from the trap posed by the current dilemma.
In the 1970s, Taiwan’s economy took off with the help of export processing zones and original equipment manufacturing of semiconductors, making Taiwan one of the four Asian Tigers — along with Hong Kong, Singapore and South Korea. However, success is the mother of failure. This economic model was so successful in the past that everyone kept relying on it in the hope that it would continue to bring success. The result is that innovation aimed at industrial upgrading has been neglected. As salaries and the cost of environmental protection have shot up, industry has been forced to move to China.
As a result of this move, the Nantze Export Processing Zone in southern Taiwan has been replaced by Shenzhen, and Hsinchu Science Park replaced by Kunshan in China’s Jiangsu Province, while Taiwanese businesspeople have continued to make money.
Two decades later, however, salaries and environmental protection costs have risen in China’s Pearl River Delta and the Yangtze River Delta. Hence, these same Taiwanese businesspeople have now been forced to move to Vietnam. In the future, they might even have to make a further move to South Africa.
If we don’t make an effort to upgrade our industries instead of continuing to follow the old formula for success, history is very likely to repeat itself.
If Ma’s economic policies continue to focus on past economic models and tie Taiwan to a “one China market,” then Taiwan will be unable to resolve the dilemma posed by the trade pact with China. The way to do so is to first dismantle Ma’s “one China market” framework by making a firm decision to upgrade industry and embrace the global market.
Ko Wen-che is chief of the surgical intensive care unit of National Taiwan University Hospital.
TRANSLATED BY WU TAIJING
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective
RSS