“We should establish a ‘Bridle Ma Society’ and then use those bridles to rein in President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) so that he doesn’t run to his own death. We have already spoiled one president in Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), are we now going to spoil Ma as well?”
You might think this sounds like something an emotional pro-green supporter would say, but you would be wrong. These are the words of Chang Hsiao-feng (張曉風), a well-known author generally revered by the pan-blue camp.
To protect the “lungs” of Taipei City, the wetlands on the site of the 202 Munitions Works in the city’s Nangang District, Chang has written to Ma and even knelt down in an appeal for Taipei’s environment. Ma nevertheless announced that the construction of the planned biotechnology park would begin on June 1.
The president of Academia Sinica, the interior minister and the director of the General Information Office took Chang on a tour of the site in an attempt to persuade her to abandon her opposition, but she would not be moved.
Regardless of how much the opposition criticizes the government, such criticism can always be deflected by claiming that it is ideologically motivated political posturing, but when Chang knelt down in a plea for the environment, it was an attack on Ma that will soil his image and may even have implications for the year-end special municipality elections. The impact reaches far beyond anything the opposition could come up with.
The main point highlighted by the conflict is that the government is losing its grip on its democratic credentials as it drifts further and further away from mainstream public opinion.
The same phenomenon can be seen in the government’s push for an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China, completely disregarding public concerns and the survival of small and medium-sized enterprises.
Although negotiations are not going smoothly at the moment, Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) has announced that the agreement will be signed next month, which makes it clear that the government’s promotion of the agreement and the public hearings currently under way are for cosmetic purposes only — no amount of opposition will be able to change the fact that the agreement will be signed.
Although Wu keeps talking about the virtues of his “grassroots economy,” he is not very friendly when he encounters opposition.
In response to opposition to the development of the 202 Munitions Works site, he asked, “How are we going to develop the economy if we are saving every wetland in Taiwan?”
It often sounds as if government officials have forgotten that they are elected by voters to act in their interests as their public servants.
The corrupting influence of power has resulted in government greed and authoritarian decisionmaking.
The government has repeatedly shown contempt for public opinion and Chang’s letter and appeal on her knees were in vain. To prevent flawed decisionmaking from becoming even worse than corruption, it is now time for the public to issue an even stronger warning to the government.
On the second anniversary of Ma’s inauguration, people should demonstrate to the government that they don’t want an ECFA.
If the public’s anger fails to alert the government to the fact that it must put the reins on Ma, then a resounding “no” in a referendum on the ECFA is the only way to save Taiwan from an irreversible disaster.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS