“We should establish a ‘Bridle Ma Society’ and then use those bridles to rein in President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) so that he doesn’t run to his own death. We have already spoiled one president in Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), are we now going to spoil Ma as well?”
You might think this sounds like something an emotional pro-green supporter would say, but you would be wrong. These are the words of Chang Hsiao-feng (張曉風), a well-known author generally revered by the pan-blue camp.
To protect the “lungs” of Taipei City, the wetlands on the site of the 202 Munitions Works in the city’s Nangang District, Chang has written to Ma and even knelt down in an appeal for Taipei’s environment. Ma nevertheless announced that the construction of the planned biotechnology park would begin on June 1.
The president of Academia Sinica, the interior minister and the director of the General Information Office took Chang on a tour of the site in an attempt to persuade her to abandon her opposition, but she would not be moved.
Regardless of how much the opposition criticizes the government, such criticism can always be deflected by claiming that it is ideologically motivated political posturing, but when Chang knelt down in a plea for the environment, it was an attack on Ma that will soil his image and may even have implications for the year-end special municipality elections. The impact reaches far beyond anything the opposition could come up with.
The main point highlighted by the conflict is that the government is losing its grip on its democratic credentials as it drifts further and further away from mainstream public opinion.
The same phenomenon can be seen in the government’s push for an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China, completely disregarding public concerns and the survival of small and medium-sized enterprises.
Although negotiations are not going smoothly at the moment, Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) has announced that the agreement will be signed next month, which makes it clear that the government’s promotion of the agreement and the public hearings currently under way are for cosmetic purposes only — no amount of opposition will be able to change the fact that the agreement will be signed.
Although Wu keeps talking about the virtues of his “grassroots economy,” he is not very friendly when he encounters opposition.
In response to opposition to the development of the 202 Munitions Works site, he asked, “How are we going to develop the economy if we are saving every wetland in Taiwan?”
It often sounds as if government officials have forgotten that they are elected by voters to act in their interests as their public servants.
The corrupting influence of power has resulted in government greed and authoritarian decisionmaking.
The government has repeatedly shown contempt for public opinion and Chang’s letter and appeal on her knees were in vain. To prevent flawed decisionmaking from becoming even worse than corruption, it is now time for the public to issue an even stronger warning to the government.
On the second anniversary of Ma’s inauguration, people should demonstrate to the government that they don’t want an ECFA.
If the public’s anger fails to alert the government to the fact that it must put the reins on Ma, then a resounding “no” in a referendum on the ECFA is the only way to save Taiwan from an irreversible disaster.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS