Amid rising controversy over plans for the development of the 202 Munitions Works site in Taipei City’s Nangang District (南港), President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) visited the site on Monday to make an inspection. How he handles this matter will show whether his attitudes have changed now that he is president, from when he was Taipei mayor.
As Taipei mayor, Ma made a policy decision, as part of his urban development plan, to turn the munitions works site into a “park for the whole city” following the closure or transfer of the military facilities. However, his successor, Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), despite having served as environment minister, has not cherished this last remaining forest area in metropolitan Taipei. The Hau administration’s urban renewal plan pays no heed whatsoever to public protests. It quickly approved an investigation conducted over a few months by a special team and has sped up progress toward handing this ready-made forest park over to the clutches of big business. It is hard to imagine that bureaucrats and businessmen could work so closely and efficiently together without getting the nod from top leaders.
The Taipei City Government plans to turn this former military land into a “special zone,” a term that will make anyone who knows anything about land development and environmental laws shudder. It means that in the future the land could be used for just about anything, all to be greenwashed by labeling it an “ecological and environmental science and technology park.”
On June 1 last year, the Foxconn Technology Group wrote to the city government requesting its assistance in obtaining land for a “digital environmental science and technology town.” The group’s proposal allocates more land for housing than for research and development facilities. Newspapers have reported that Foxconn has pulled out, but in fact this only applies to the 25 hectares that have been assigned to the Academia Sinica for use as a biotechnology park, while the remaining 144 hectares offer much greater potential for profit.
Kaohsiung is a different story. Following the downsizing and streamlining of Taiwan’s armed forces, military land in urban areas is being made available for other purposes. In response to public demand, the Weiwuying (衛武營) former military camp in Kaohsiung County’s Fongshan City (鳳山) has been turned into an urban park that enhances Greater Kaohsiung’s development as a maritime metropolis. The aim is to transform Kaohsiung from a sooty industrial city into a green and livable one. Meanwhile, Taipei is turning forests and wetlands that could be easily accessed by its residents into industrial zones, or into private gardens for an elite minority of wealthy businesspeople.
On April 24, amid the clamor of popular protest, a special team set up by the Cabinet to clear up and reactivate disused land decided that over 230 hectares of land in Taipei City, including the 202 Munitions Works site, the Air Force Command Headquarters and the building housing the Ministry of National Defense after it has moved, should be handed over bit by bit to the National Property Administration. Speculation will continue to drive up land prices in central Taipei and those residents who are lucky enough not to be driven out to find homes in distant suburbs will have to climb over the flood defense barriers that border the city’s rivers to enjoy any greenery at all.
The world is engaged in a fight against global warming. If government officials are still stuck in the old concept of development for development’s sake, the public should not hesitate to vote them out in November’s special municipality elections.
Pan Han-shen is co-convener of the Green Party Taiwan.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS