It isn’t hard for the public to pick up on one noticeable trend on the nation’s political scene: Frequent visits by Chinese officials.
Currently visiting Taiwan is a 2,000-strong delegation led by the governor of Fujian Province, Huang Xiaojing (黃小晶). Prior to Huang, there were also visits made by the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Hubei Provincial Committee Secretary Luo Qingquan (羅清泉) and the CCP’s Jiangsu Provincial Committee Secretary Liang Baohua (梁保華).
The Chinese delegations are usually characterized by a large number of delegates, billions of dollars in investments and various cooperation proposals they reportedly pledge to local businesses.
According to a report by the Central News Agency, visits by Chinese officials will soon enter the high season with Zhejiang Province Governor Lu Zushan (呂祖善), the CCP’s secretary for Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guo Shengkun (郭聲琨), and Shannxi Province Governor Yuan Chunqing (袁純清) leading delegations to Taiwan in the coming months.
While some may wonder why there has been a sudden frenzy of Chinese officials visiting Taiwan, the answer is simple: Why not? Indeed, riding high on the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government’s eagerness to tout itself as a peacemaker in efforts to improve cross-strait relations, any Chinese official — regardless of ranking or level — can easily count on being thrown into the media limelight and treated to lavish welcomes arranged by KMT officials. After all, there’s no faster way to garner media exposure — or the chance to raise their profile in the eyes of the higher-ups in Beijing — than to make a trip to Taiwan and be the center of attention, all while surrounded by KMT heavyweights.
Chinese officials are more than welcome to visit Taiwan, as the visits help promote mutual understanding and allow them to experience Taiwan’s vibrant democracy first-hand.
It is a different matter, however, when the Chinese officials return Taiwan’s hospitality and friendliness with dubious promises and unsubstantiated declarations of large investments.
Following rampant local media coverage on the slew of procurements promised by the Chinese delegations, a question has been raised in many people’s minds: How many of the various grand business and investment proposals pledged by the visiting Chinese delegations actually materialize?
Even the Mainland Affairs Council, in response to inquiries from the press, readily acknowledged that it could not substantiate the veracity of investments proclaimed by Chinese delegations.
In view of this, one can’t help but recall the promise made by Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) during his visit to Taiwan in November 2008 that China would purchase tonnes of oranges from Taiwan. Later, however, it turned out that Taiwanese orange farmers ended up losing money selling their goods to China.
Against the backdrop of the KMT government’s all-out campaign to promote an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China, the huge purchasing deals declared by visiting Chinese delegations work to the government’s liking.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), however, is well advised to make sure that his government acts responsibly and debunks any of the promises made by the Chinese delegations if they are found to be little more than hot air.
It would be truly irresponsible on the part of the Ma government to play along with the Chinese delegations and construct a false impression that the visitors are like Santa, spreading gifts to Taiwanese businesses, when in fact they leave the latter nothing to look forward to but empty promises.
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic
RSS