When Rafik Gindy graduated from high school, he knew he wanted to become an engineer. So he enrolled at the American University in Cairo (AUC) and prepared to immerse himself in math and science.
However, the university had a different idea.
Gindy knew what he wanted to be, but did not exactly know who he was. That was what the university wanted him to think about, in a class called the Human Quest: Exploring the Big Questions.
“I thought identity was just your name, your culture, but now I know it’s really complex,” said Gindy, a slender freshman who shook his head at that revelation.
Who am I?
What does it mean to be human?
These are the kinds of questions posed to undergraduate students entering this 90-year-old university during what the president, David Arnold, called a first year of “disorientation.” During disorientation, the students — 85 percent of them Egyptians — are taught to learn in ways quite at odds with the traditional method of teaching in this country, where instructors lecture, students memorize and tests are exercises in regurgitation.
“It’s different here because there is room for people to express themselves,” said Manar Mohsen, a junior majoring in political science and journalism. “It is not that simple outside, where it is more about conformity.”
Egypt, like much of the Arab world, demands conformity in many corners of life. Education is based on the concept of rote learning, and creativity in the classroom is often discouraged. Students at Cairo University say they memorize and recite, never analyze and hypothesize.
So the idea of a liberal arts education aimed at developing critical thinking skills is often new to the students. That can make for a difficult transition. Plagiarism is often a problem at both the undergraduate and graduate levels, officials here said, because the students — more accustomed to rote learning — see nothing wrong with spitting back someone else’s work and have never been held to rigorous academic standards.
“For a lot of the kids here, the idea that you are supposed to have your own ideas is a novelty,” said Lisa Anderson, the university provost, who is on leave from Columbia University. “There was nothing in their previous education that would have exposed them to these standards.”
American University is a private, elite school, although university officials sometimes recoil at the elite label. Yet, the school is expensive and so is generally out of reach for all but the wealthiest families and a handful of scholarship students.
Tuition and fees for Egyptian students run about US$19,600 a year, a princely sum in a country where about half the population lives on about US$2 a day.
The campus exudes affluence. Students joke about the “Gucci Corridor,” a spot where well-coiffed students gather each afternoon. There is no cafeteria, only expensive fast food stands.
“We are all rich and spoiled,” said one student, upset that many of her classmates were not more politically aware.
However, in some respects, the elite label is a strength. American University plays a central role as a sort of intellectual boot camp for young people who will become leaders in government and the economy.
“If we teach the elite to be good citizens, that’s not a bad thing,” Anderson said.
Nabil Fahmy, the former longtime ambassador to the US, said that during his nine years in Washington, at least 40 percent of the embassy staff members were American University graduates, as was he.
The university was founded in 1919 by a group of Presbyterian missionaries. Unlike the satellite campuses of prestigious US universities in oil-rich Persian Gulf states, it is quite homegrown and often reflects the community around it.
The university was originally in Tahrir Square, in the center of Cairo, a hyper-urban landscape where the air is thick, the din overwhelming and the mosaic of Egyptian life is on every corner. That was part of the university’s appeal.
However, over the years it has grown and now serves 5,000 undergraduates on an architecturally inspiring, if geographically isolated, US$400 million, 105-hectare campus in a suburb called New Cairo. Instead of urban grime the campus is surrounded by villas and developments with names such as Golden Heights.
The location redefined the university just as it was beginning to redefine itself as a first-rate university rather than a finishing school for Egypt’s elite. However, as the school has grown, so has a conflict within the university itself: Can it change its mission while retaining its liberal arts core and preserving classes such as the Big Questions?
Some say it needs to move away from that way of thinking.
“We are moving more and more into professional schools, like business, engineering, sciences,” said Fahmy, who is the founding dean of a new school of global affairs and public policy.
“The challenge we have now is we have moved from a small college that thought it was a university, to a university that has to change its thinking from being a small college,” he said, defining a view that is anathema to some others on campus.
There are other pressures, too, coming from a society that holds engineers in such high esteem that the profession is also a courtesy title, like doctor.
“The humanities in general, and philosophy specifically, are seen as either frivolous or, at the very least, not financially prudent, by many of the very people who seek what makes AUC unique,” said Nathaniel Bowditch, an assistant professor of philosophy.
Bowditch said, “learning how to think rather than what to think prepares a person for all professions,” and without that, “the academy becomes nothing more than a trade school.”
For now, the university leadership says it remains committed to its core mission, and will continue to ensure that incoming Egyptian students relearn how to learn, officials said.
“We want our students to be imaginative in their fields,” Anderson said.
So for the time being, at least, the Big Questions class remains safe, which seems to suit the students just fine.
“I took the course because my brother took it two years ago,” Gindy said. “I like how it explained things we never knew, like how the world began.”
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
Looking at the state of China’s economy this year, many experts have said that weak domestic demand and insufficient internal consumption might be its Achilles’ heel, with the latter being related to culture and demographics. Since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took office in 2013, he has been combating extravagance and corruption as well as rectifying a bad atmosphere. China expert Stephen Roach said the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) regulatory crackdown has been targeting Chinese tycoons, such as Alibaba Group Holding Ltd founder Jack Ma (馬雲), and opposing what the CCP defines as “excessively extravagant lifestyles,” such as playing too
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use