The government executed four men at 7:30pm on Friday night, ending a moratorium on executions that had been in place since December 2005.
Premier Wu Den-yi (吳敦義) said yesterday that the government was simply upholding the rule of law and practicing social justice. The country must handle death row inmates according to the law unless there are legal reasons to justify suspending executions, he said.
The crimes for which the four were convicted met the current criteria for crimes meriting capital punishment: kidnapping and murder or multiple murders. However, whether all the legal requirements for carrying out the death penalty had been met and the timing of the executions are questionable.
Less than two months ago, former minister of justice Wang Ching-feng (王清峰) resigned over the furor that erupted when she refused to enforce the death penalty. Her successor, Minister of Justice Tseng Yung-fu (曾勇夫), told a public hearing on April 21 that the ministry would review the cases of all 44 inmates on death row and exhaust all measures before conducting executions. He also said the first executions would most likely take place before the end of the year.
Therefore, given both the moratorium and the Council of Grand Justices’ agreement to hear appeals of death-sentence cases, there was something unseemly about the rush to enforce the law. The council had given the Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty (TAEDP), which filed a request for an interpretation on behalf of the 44 people on death row, until today to submit letters of authorization from the prisoners.
Government officials have consistently cited opinion poll findings that a majority of Taiwanese — 70 percent — favor keeping the death penalty. Yet other polls have found that 53 percent of respondents support replacing the death penalty with life imprisonment without parole. Sixty-two percent support commuting a death sentence to life or a long prison term if those convicted behave well in prison or show remorse, with 88 percent believe the death sentence could sometimes be handed down erroneously.
On April 8, Tseng told the legislature that even if most people said they supported the death penalty, the government would still push for abolition, though like other administration officials, he wouldn’t give a timetable.
News of the executions came on the same day as reports from Lebanon that a suspect in the murders of four family members had been lynched. A mob beat and stabbed the suspect to death, dragged his body through the streets so others could stomp on his corpse and then strung the body on a pole using a butcher’s hook. The Beirut government condemned the incident and vowed to punish those responsible, but some villagers quoted by wire agencies appear unrepentant about taking justice into their own hands.
The right to life should never be subject to opinion polls, just as a lynch mob should never replace the right to a fair trial. Protection of human rights means protecting people from shifting public opinion, shifts in political power and the arbitrary enforcement of justice.
While Friday night’s executions were not lynch mob justice, TAEDP executive director Lin Hsin-yi’s (林欣怡) characterization of them as hasty and furtive was absolutely spot-on.
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
RSS