At a press conference on April 13, Minister Without Portfolio Yiin Chii-ming (尹啟銘) questioned the accuracy of comments on an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) made by Wang To-far (王塗發), a professor of economics who claims that Taiwan would have to remove the tariffs on 90 percent of its Chinese imports within 10 years of signing an ECFA.
According to Yiin, the length of time and the percentage of products that will be tax-exempt will be determined by the needs of the signatory countries. Using the Japan-Singapore Economic Partnership Agreement as an example, he said that agreement only covers 76 percent of Japan’s imports from Singapore.
In response to Wang’s estimate, the Chinese-language daily the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) reported on April 14 that Article 24 of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, the predecessor of the WTO, states that a free-trade area shall be formed within “a reasonable length of time” after a free-trade agreement (FTA) is signed and that this period may exceed 10 years only in exceptional cases. It is thus wrong to say that it will depend on the needs of the signatory countries.
As for Yiin’s claim that the Japan-Singapore FTA covers 76 percent of Japan’s imports from Singapore, that only tells half the story, and the wrong half at that.
The WTO calculates the ratio of openness — the trade coverage ratio — using two methods: One is calculated based on the number of product categories and the other is calculated based on import value.
The Taiwan WTO Center at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research, which is responsible for the government’s ECFA research, also publishes an e-paper on the WTO. Deputy Director Tu Chaw-hsia (杜巧霞) published an article in Volume 36 of the e-paper, released in 2005.
According to Tu’s article, “The concerns over coverage in RTA [Regional Trade Agreement] negotiations,” the tax-exempt ratio of Japanese imports from Singapore is indeed 76 percent when calculated based on the tax number of product categories. If, however, calculated based on import value, the tax exemption ratio reaches as high as 93 percent.
The reason for the large gap between the two methods, as Tu explains in her article, is that “Japan has reservations about opening its agricultural market while Singapore has no agricultural sector … Japan does not import any agricultural products from Singapore.”
In other words, Japan could have listed Singaporean agricultural products as duty-free and increased the coverage to more than 90 percent as calculated based on the number of product categories.
However, this would not increase the value of imports from Singapore, since it has no agricultural sector and thus cannot export agricultural products to Japan.
This means that the tax-exempt ratio of Japan’s imports from Singapore is more meaningful when calculated based on import value, which is 93 percent.
More interestingly, Tu’s article also states that according to WTO statistics from 2002, the tax-exempt ratio on imports exceeded 95 percent for most of the 53 RTAs for which information was available in August 2001. For industrial products, the ratio was also as high as 95 percent with the exception of Turkey.
Despite already far exceeding Yiin’s claim, Wang’s prediction of a ratio of 90 percent is in fact rather conservative.
Lin Kien-tsu is a member of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
I came to Taiwan to pursue my degree thinking that Taiwanese are “friendly,” but I was welcomed by Taiwanese classmates laughing at my friend’s name, Maria (瑪莉亞). At the time, I could not understand why they were mocking the name of Jesus’ mother. Later, I learned that “Maria” had become a stereotype — a shorthand for Filipino migrant workers. That was because many Filipino women in Taiwan, especially those who became house helpers, happen to have that name. With the rapidly increasing number of foreigners coming to Taiwan to work or study, more Taiwanese are interacting, socializing and forming relationships with
Chinese social media influencer “Yaya in Taiwan” (亞亞在台灣), whose real name is Liu Zhenya (劉振亞), made statements advocating for “reunifying Taiwan [with China] through military force.” After verifying that Liu did indeed make such statements, the National Immigration Agency revoked her dependency-based residency permit. She must now either leave the country voluntarily or be deported. Operating your own page and becoming an influencer require a certain amount of support and user traffic. You must successfully gain approval for your views and attract an audience. Although Liu must leave the country, I cannot help but wonder how many more “Yayas” are still
Earlier signs suggest that US President Donald Trump’s policy on Taiwan is set to move in a more resolute direction, as his administration begins to take a tougher approach toward America’s main challenger at the global level, China. Despite its deepening economic woes, China continues to flex its muscles, including conducting provocative military drills off Taiwan, Australia and Vietnam recently. A recent Trump-signed memorandum on America’s investment policy was more about the China threat than about anything else. Singling out the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as a foreign adversary directing investments in American companies to obtain cutting-edge technologies, it said
The recent termination of Tibetan-language broadcasts by Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) is a significant setback for Tibetans both in Tibet and across the global diaspora. The broadcasts have long served as a vital lifeline, providing uncensored news, cultural preservation and a sense of connection for a community often isolated by geopolitical realities. For Tibetans living under Chinese rule, access to independent information is severely restricted. The Chinese government tightly controls media and censors content that challenges its narrative. VOA and RFA broadcasts have been among the few sources of uncensored news available to Tibetans, offering insights
RSS