Minister of Health Yaung Chih-liang (楊志良) had to threaten to resign to show that he was serious, but now President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has finally lent his support to raising National Health Insurance (NHI) premiums and implementing a second-generation health insurance system. On Thursday, the Cabinet also approved a change to NHI regulations that could be a shot in the arm for Taiwan’s health insurance system, which has earned praise in Taiwan and abroad.
The question now is whether implementing the second generation of the NHI will guarantee a sound system. Given the current situation, there is little reason to be optimistic.
The current plan focuses on improving the NHI’s finances by raising premiums and by calculating premiums based on annual household income instead of registered insurance subscriptions — roughly equivalent to an employee’s monthly salary.
Although the Cabinet stresses that premiums will not rise for 60 percent of those insured, premiums will rise for many to pay for the huge and constantly increasing NHI deficit.
Most people are unlikely to complain if increasing their insurance premiums by a sum equivalent to the cost of a lunchbox will help maintain a sustainable health insurance system. If they think implementing the second-generation NHI system will resolve the deficit problem, however, they are naive.
The second-generation system aims to raise premiums and increase revenues to solve the most urgent problem, but to this day, the Department of Health (DOH) hasn’t offered any concrete suggestions on how to cut expenditures. In only 13 years, from 1996 to last year, the NHI’s medical expenditures more than doubled from NT$224.8 billion (US$7.13 billion) to NT$470 billion, and it is expected to keep rising between 3 percent and 5 percent annually.
If the government doesn’t fix all the leaks, these increases will cause the deficit to skyrocket in just a few years.
The problem with health insurance expenditures is an open secret. Hospitals and clinics report an exaggerated number of patients, and doctors exaggerate their NHI expenses by extending treatments and making unnecessary examinations and operations. In addition, hospitals negotiate prices with drug companies annually to cut costs, but then report inflated prices to the Bureau of National Health Insurance. The bureau reimburses the hospitals, which pocket the difference between actual and reported prices.
These irregularities are common knowledge, so why doesn’t the second-generation NHI address these practices? Because this is a matter of shared interests. Many of the DOH’s public health policies require the cooperation of hospitals, so as long as hospitals are not too out of line, the DOH will not interfere too much with the practical aspects of their business.
Doctors and pharmaceutical companies are two of the most privileged pressure groups, and many political contributions in Taiwan’s elections come from the latter group. As soon as the debate turns toward health insurance reform, vested interests in the pharmaceutical industry that stand to lose pressure the Cabinet and legislators. Reform measures aimed at eliminating irregularities quickly fade away and debate about health insurance reform is forever doomed to address only one half of the problem — the revenue side.
As the government implements the second generation of the NHI, it should not ask the public for money while closing its eyes to the pharmaceutical industry’s behavior and allowing irregularities to continue. The government must make concrete reforms to cut expenditures — if it continues to direct reforms at only half the problem, the second-generation NHI system is doomed to failure.
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,