The relatives of the 46 men missing from the South Korean corvette Cheonan may never know what caused it to explode and sink last Friday. But if one explanation — that the ship struck a North Korean mine — is true, the men of the Cheonan will have become the latest casualties of the world’s longest-running military conflict.
This is not to say that North Korea meant to sink the Cheonan, though that cannot be ruled out. But regardless of intent, the state of congealed hostilities that exists on the 38th parallel is a dangerous anachronism. It is time it ended.
The Korean peninsula is the final holdout of the Cold War. The US, in the aftermath of WWII, partitioned a country that had a history of nearly a thousand years as a unified kingdom, and whose citizens had a creditable record of fighting the Japanese. While the US propped up a right-wing dictatorship in the south; the communist guerrilla leader, Kim Il-sung, established his dynasty in the north.
When the US withdrew its troops in 1950, Kim invaded in an attempt to reunite the country. After he was beaten back to the 38th parallel, the US-led UN forces invaded the north, bringing China into the war. By 1953, after three years of heavy casualties and the devastation by bombing of North Korea, a truce was signed at the 38th parallel, and a dangerous stand-off began. A peace treaty was never concluded, though it has remained on the agenda, including the so far unproductive six-party talks.
Though it seems unbelievable now, there was little to choose between the standards of living in North and South Korea until the 1980s — and, until democracy finally came to the south in the same decade, both were dictatorships. Then the USSR’s collapse deprived North Korea of the cheap energy its economy relied on, and the south began its spectacular modernization. Now, despite help from China, the north is an economic basket case and South Koreans worry about the economic and social costs of reunification, however remote the prospect.
Reunification is unlikely to get closer without the first step of a peace treaty — a longstanding North Korean aspiration — that normalizes relations with the south and US. Only then could North Korea begin what will undoubtedly be a tortuous road to domestic reform and economic recovery, and only then is there likely to be progress in defusing North Korea’s nuclear program.
There is no magic bullet to resolve this crisis. But waiting for North Korea to collapse — which seems still to be at the heart of US policy — has little to recommend it. Paranoid garrison states do not collapse easily; nor can dictatorships be relied on to go down without a heavy price in human suffering. We might wish the regime away, but should be careful about how we seek to make it happen.
There are arguably more dependable routes. The West has been close to buying out North Korea’s nuclear weapons program with the promise of a controlled and subsidized program of nuclear energy. This would help to stabilize the economy and allow North Korea to stop relying on its weapons program as its only international leverage. There are many examples of authoritarian dictatorships that evolved into more humane systems through contact, trade, cultural exchange and normalization: South Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam all had decades of authoritarianism. China, the biggest of all, was at its most paranoid and repressive from the late 1950s to the mid-1970s. They changed through growth, development, and domestic — not external — pressure.
China’s approach to North Korea has evolved with its own development. Once seen as a buffer against US aggression, North Korea is now China’s problem child, rattling its nuclear program to gain attention, a source of instability on China’s border.
While China has thrived with economic liberalization, North Korea continues on the road to bankruptcy, in part because of the regime’s refusal to reform. China is growing tired of a game that has long outlived its usefulness, and anxious about North Korea’s deterioration. Instead of being an obstacle to normalization on the Korean peninsula and the demilitarization that would allow, China could be a key ally.
The ailing Kim Jong-il is likely to visit Beijing soon and will still be received with due courtesy: Beijing has little difficulty understanding the desire for respect of a small Asian country that has built its identity on resisting imperialism. It is a harder sell in the West, but the result could be worth the effort.
Isabel Hilton is the editor of Chinadialogue.net.
To The Honorable Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜): We would like to extend our sincerest regards to you for representing Taiwan at the inauguration of US President Donald Trump on Monday. The Taiwanese-American community was delighted to see that Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan speaker not only received an invitation to attend the event, but successfully made the trip to the US. We sincerely hope that you took this rare opportunity to share Taiwan’s achievements in freedom, democracy and economic development with delegations from other countries. In recent years, Taiwan’s economic growth and world-leading technology industry have been a source of pride for Taiwanese-Americans.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Next week, the nation is to celebrate the Lunar New Year break. Unfortunately, cold winds are a-blowing, literally and figuratively. The Central Weather Administration has warned of an approaching cold air mass, while obstinate winds of chaos eddy around the Legislative Yuan. English theologian Thomas Fuller optimistically pointed out in 1650 that “it’s always darkest before the dawn.” We could paraphrase by saying the coldest days are just before the renewed hope of spring. However, one must temper any optimism about the damage being done in the legislature by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), under