A centennial is a very special moment; the celebration of the nation’s 100th anniversary should be a joyous event for the whole country. However, because the organizing committee wants to avoid the sensitive phrase “the nation’s founding,” the logo and the slogan for the event will say: “The Republic of China: 100 Years of Excellence.” In one fell swoop the organizers have changed the spirit of the whole event, and no one really understands what is being celebrated anymore. This has nothing to do with excellence, and many people simply feel disappointed.
Jerry Fan (范可欽), an advertising professional involved in organizing the event, said the phrase “nation’s founding” was a bit sensitive, so to stay more neutral, it was decided to highlight Taiwan’s place in history, and that’s why “nation’s founding” was replaced with “excellence.” Fan said “excellence” both highlights the historic record over the past century and implies a wish that the next 100 years will be just as excellent.
A report in the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) has set off a debate by saying that the Republic of China (ROC) government was afraid of using the phrase “100th anniversary of the nation’s founding” for fear that it might displease China. Council for Cultural Affairs Minister Emile Sheng (盛治仁), who is leading the organizing committee — the Republic of China (Taiwan) Centenary Foundation (中華民國建國一百年基金會) — hurried to calm things down by saying that using the word “excellence” did not preclude the use of the words “nation’s founding” and added that both the name of the foundation and the activities were celebrations of the ROC’s founding.
The slogan “100 Years of Excellence” is in itself not all that excellent. Slogans do not represent reality, and most are an expression of a common emotion and hope used as a hypnotic device. The main point, however, isn’t whether the slogan is excellent, but rather how Fan, who is not even on the preparatory committee, can decide that the words “nation’s founding” are sensitive and should be replaced by the word “excellent.” How was this decision reached, and what were the opinions of the other participants in the discussion?
The organizing committee and the government must understand that the public doesn’t care if an excellent slogan will make for an excellent activity. What it cares about is that the ROC must not decide that even its own founding is too sensitive to be mentioned. The government cannot constantly denigrate Taiwan by always thinking first about what China might say or think. Fan is in advertising, and it is part of his job to use big words, but his ideas are representative of the kind of person who immediately shrinks two sizes as soon as China is mentioned. That kind of person turns with the wind, and if a cross-strait economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) is signed, Taiwan will move even faster toward China. The 100th anniversary of the ROC’s founding may well be its farewell.
The People’s Republic of China celebrated its 60th anniversary last year, and even produced a film called The Founding of a Republic (建國大業). Now the ROC is about to celebrate its 100th anniversary, but doesn’t even dare to say so, which is humiliating to many people. Fan has aroused questions among many Taiwanese and has called up deep worries about the continued existence of the ROC. Not only will pan-green supporters be annoyed at this, it will also be unacceptable to many swing voters and even pan-blue supporters.
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in
RSS