Here’s a hypothetical question: Let’s assume that Taiwan and China sign an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) in May and then carry out cross-strait peace negotiations without ruling out the possibility of a timetable for unification. If this happened, could Taiwanese feel confident that President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration would secure the best deal during the process to unification?
Hong Kong provides a useful contrast. Before retrocession in 1997, when they were getting down to the details of the transfer of power with the Chinese, the British government made every attempt to cover every practical aspect possible. It even made provisions so that Hong Kong residents who refused to live under communist rule could emigrate. As the talks were conducted by two parties of equal standing, Beijing was obliged to give assurances that the region would “remain unchanged for 50 years.”
Let’s suppose, for the sake of argument, that the government’s cross-strait policy leads to its natural conclusion of “eventual unification.” Would Taiwanese be offered an initial grace period similar to that offered to Hong Kong prior to the handover? Or would the government do a repeat performance of former National Security Council (NSC) secretary-general Su Chi’s (蘇起) handling of the US beef deal, forcing the public to accept it after an agreement has already been signed? What if Ma has already overseen the handover before Taiwanese woke up and smelled the coffee, finding themselves under a Chinese government that is warning countries like the US and Japan not to interfere in its “internal” affairs? Can we trust that an effective mechanism would be in place to monitor the conditions for unification, ensuring that the rights of Taiwanese are protected and Taiwan’s autonomy respected?
These are all assumptions and the intention here is not to put the fright into anyone. Rather, the object is to highlight the reality that, given the current political situation, the legislature is the only institution that can restrain the executive branch’s China policy. The government is keeping the goings-on of a number of negotiations under wraps and the public has no idea what is happening. We also have no way of knowing how cross-strait economic and political integration is going to affect the “status quo.” At least the US beef fiasco has taught us that our elected representatives must listen to what we say and not simply serve as rubber stamps for the whims of the Cabinet.
Of course, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Secretary-General King Pu-tsung’s (金溥聰) hawkish moves — such as making internal rules to strictly regulate the performance of legislators-at-large — are attempts to strengthen the party’s authority and make sure that Ma gets what he wants.
Cross-strait policies, however, are a sensitive topic. Data Systems Consulting Co serves as an example. Facing pressure from the legislature, the Ministry of Economic Affairs canceled a contract with the firm after it was taken over by Chinese capital. This proves that the legislative branch must keep an eye on things and the government on its toes when it comes to risk management, to make sure that it is not being manipulated. This is precisely what democracy is for. In other words, it is hopeful that the legislature can serve as a more active “safety valve” on cross-strait policies and that Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng’s (王金平) proposal of a “cross-strait affairs monitoring task force” is a step in the right direction. If the legislature relinquishes its power, there will be no monitoring mechanism for cross-strait affairs. The cross-strait policy is just too risky for us to trust it blindly.
Ku Chung-hwa is the chairman of Citizens’ Congress Watch.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
The EU’s biggest banks have spent years quietly creating a new way to pay that could finally allow customers to ditch their Visa Inc and Mastercard Inc cards — the latest sign that the region is looking to dislodge two of the most valuable financial firms on the planet. Wero, as the project is known, is now rolling out across much of western Europe. Backed by 16 major banks and payment processors including BNP Paribas SA, Deutsche Bank AG and Worldline SA, the platform would eventually allow a German customer to instantly settle up with, say, a hotel in France
On August 6, Ukraine crossed its northeastern border and invaded the Russian region of Kursk. After spending more than two years seeking to oust Russian forces from its own territory, Kiev turned the tables on Moscow. Vladimir Putin seemed thrown off guard. In a televised meeting about the incursion, Putin came across as patently not in control of events. The reasons for the Ukrainian offensive remain unclear. It could be an attempt to wear away at the morale of both Russia’s military and its populace, and to boost morale in Ukraine; to undermine popular and elite confidence in Putin’s rule; to
A traffic accident in Taichung — a city bus on Sept. 22 hit two Tunghai University students on a pedestrian crossing, killing one and injuring the other — has once again brought up the issue of Taiwan being a “living hell for pedestrians” and large vehicle safety to public attention. A deadly traffic accident in Taichung on Dec. 27, 2022, when a city bus hit a foreign national, his Taiwanese wife and their one-year-old son in a stroller on a pedestrian crossing, killing the wife and son, had shocked the public, leading to discussions and traffic law amendments. However, just after the
The international community was shocked when Israel was accused of launching an attack on Lebanon by rigging pagers to explode. Most media reports in Taiwan focused on whether the pagers were produced locally, arousing public concern. However, Taiwanese should also look at the matter from a security and national defense perspective. Lebanon has eschewed technology, partly because of concerns that countries would penetrate its telecommunications networks to steal confidential information or launch cyberattacks. It has largely abandoned smartphones and modern telecommunications systems, replacing them with older and relatively basic communications equipment. However, the incident shows that using older technology alone cannot