The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has convened regular meetings to discuss its recent victories in local elections and propose strategies for the nomination of candidates for the five year-end municipality elections and the 2012 presidential election.
The party is expected to adopt a “delaying tactic” and could be hesitant to bring the municipal elections to the level of the presidential election, making every effort to win them all.
As a former director of the DPP’s Department of Culture and Communications, I have the obligation to remind DPP leaders that they must avoid using talented members in the race for minor positions and, in so doing, sacrificing the main election for small gains.
In this past year’s elections, the main key to the DPP’s victories was President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) poor performance rather than local issues or the quality of the candidates. From a critic’s perspective, the party may have won back its loyal supporters, but failed to win swing voters — not even in the three legislative by-election wins on Jan. 9.
Therefore, looking to the presidential election, the DPP has merely regained its competitiveness, while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) will make every effort to improve its performance.
The question of how to move “moderate” voters who are concerned with the nation’s future, or those who may be willing to change party allegiance, will therefore be of the utmost importance. For the KMT, the task would logically be Ma’s responsibility. For the DPP, it will be that of its presidential nominee.
Following the KMT’s series of defeats, Ma and KMT Secretary-General King Pu-tsung’s (金浦聰) team will likely not hesitate to cater to the needs of swing voters. As a matter of fact, the loss of trust of swing voters was the reason for the DPP’s miserable performance in the 2008 presidential election, which pitted it against Ma and King.
Will King’s appointment as KMT secretary-general work again? We cannot only look at the results of the Jan. 9 or Feb. 27 legislative by-elections. The Ma-King team should actively dispose of the party’s stolen assets and force the implementation the amended Organic Act of the Executive Yuan (行政院組織法) to streamline the government, which would help it accomplish a series of difficult reform tasks. If swing voters are not moved by these efforts, at least they cannot criticize them. This is where King’s strength lies.
Hence, if the DPP smells victory in the presidential election, it should not restrict itself to considering the party’s heavyweights and should be bold enough to abandon its wait-and-see attitude. As there are more qualified presidential candidates in the DPP than there are talented people willing to run in municipality elections, perhaps it should appoint a presidential candidate as soon as possible and use the three municipalities currently under KMT rule as a stage for the next generation of leaders. The local government head elections on Dec. 12 last year serve as a good example.
The DPP should also make major national policy directions its main weapon in the municipality election campaigns. It should not limit itself to candidates’ momentum, electoral history or internal tactics such as delaying factional struggles. If it does, after the year-end elections, the winners may be unable to run in the presidential election and vice versa. The party could also be in a predicament, as a winner would be unable to finish this term for the presidential race. Under such circumstances, how could the party possibly propose a blueprint for national development? The only outcome of using major talent in the battle for minor positions would be to suffer big losses for little gain.
Phoenix Cheng is a former DPP legislator.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun