The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has convened regular meetings to discuss its recent victories in local elections and propose strategies for the nomination of candidates for the five year-end municipality elections and the 2012 presidential election.
The party is expected to adopt a “delaying tactic” and could be hesitant to bring the municipal elections to the level of the presidential election, making every effort to win them all.
As a former director of the DPP’s Department of Culture and Communications, I have the obligation to remind DPP leaders that they must avoid using talented members in the race for minor positions and, in so doing, sacrificing the main election for small gains.
In this past year’s elections, the main key to the DPP’s victories was President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) poor performance rather than local issues or the quality of the candidates. From a critic’s perspective, the party may have won back its loyal supporters, but failed to win swing voters — not even in the three legislative by-election wins on Jan. 9.
Therefore, looking to the presidential election, the DPP has merely regained its competitiveness, while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) will make every effort to improve its performance.
The question of how to move “moderate” voters who are concerned with the nation’s future, or those who may be willing to change party allegiance, will therefore be of the utmost importance. For the KMT, the task would logically be Ma’s responsibility. For the DPP, it will be that of its presidential nominee.
Following the KMT’s series of defeats, Ma and KMT Secretary-General King Pu-tsung’s (金浦聰) team will likely not hesitate to cater to the needs of swing voters. As a matter of fact, the loss of trust of swing voters was the reason for the DPP’s miserable performance in the 2008 presidential election, which pitted it against Ma and King.
Will King’s appointment as KMT secretary-general work again? We cannot only look at the results of the Jan. 9 or Feb. 27 legislative by-elections. The Ma-King team should actively dispose of the party’s stolen assets and force the implementation the amended Organic Act of the Executive Yuan (行政院組織法) to streamline the government, which would help it accomplish a series of difficult reform tasks. If swing voters are not moved by these efforts, at least they cannot criticize them. This is where King’s strength lies.
Hence, if the DPP smells victory in the presidential election, it should not restrict itself to considering the party’s heavyweights and should be bold enough to abandon its wait-and-see attitude. As there are more qualified presidential candidates in the DPP than there are talented people willing to run in municipality elections, perhaps it should appoint a presidential candidate as soon as possible and use the three municipalities currently under KMT rule as a stage for the next generation of leaders. The local government head elections on Dec. 12 last year serve as a good example.
The DPP should also make major national policy directions its main weapon in the municipality election campaigns. It should not limit itself to candidates’ momentum, electoral history or internal tactics such as delaying factional struggles. If it does, after the year-end elections, the winners may be unable to run in the presidential election and vice versa. The party could also be in a predicament, as a winner would be unable to finish this term for the presidential race. Under such circumstances, how could the party possibly propose a blueprint for national development? The only outcome of using major talent in the battle for minor positions would be to suffer big losses for little gain.
Phoenix Cheng is a former DPP legislator.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
The recent passing of Taiwanese actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known to many as “Big S,” due to influenza-induced pneumonia at just 48 years old is a devastating reminder that the flu is not just a seasonal nuisance — it is a serious and potentially fatal illness. Hsu, a beloved actress and cultural icon who shaped the memories of many growing up in Taiwan, should not have died from a preventable disease. Yet her death is part of a larger trend that Taiwan has ignored for too long — our collective underestimation of the flu and our low uptake of the
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic