Last Monday the legislature passed an amendment to the Local Government Act (地方制度法) after a scuffle at the third reading. The discussion in the media has focused on three points: the appointment of township chiefs as district chiefs in the special municipalities; whether township representatives who become district advisers should be salaried; and the mayoral candidates for the municipalities.
The number of seats for elected representatives will shrink because of appointments, and the rivalry for city councilor slots will affect political parties. As the primaries intensify, the losers may leave their parties, potentially causing another wave of party reconstruction.
Under the new system, the total number of councilors will increase from 96 in Taipei and Kaohsiung to 315 seats for all five municipalities. The political resources of municipality councilors are not inferior to that of legislators. Some Taipei and Kaohsiung City councilors even enjoy higher publicity than legislators. After the formation of the five municipalities, the status and influence of city councilors is likely to rise, and political rookies and defeated legislators looking for a comeback will fight for these positions.
Under the amendment, Taipei County’s 65 councilors and 460 township representatives will drop to 66 councilors for Sinbei City. For Taichung City and County, which will merge, 103 councilors and 282 township representatives will drop to 63 councilors.
For Tainan City and County, 91 councilors and 388 township representatives will also be reduced to 63 councilors. For Kaohsiung City and County, 98 councilors and 308 township representatives will be cut to 66 councilors. The drop in elected seats in these municipalities will improve the quality of elected representatives and strengthen the party nomination process. However, because of strong competition and opposition to the amendment, a number of candidates may withdraw from their parties, especially the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
In Taipei City — the only municipality where the number of councilor seats will rise — there will be an increase of one or two seats in each district unless the electoral districts are redrawn. This will likely attract outsiders or the losers of legislative elections. Some of the pan-blue camp’s current Taipei City councilors formerly belonged to the People First Party (PFP) or the New Party (NP). Will the pan-blue candidates be pitted against each other again?
In the single-member district legislative elections, a candidate must secure more than half the vote to win, making two-party politics unstoppable. By contrast, the city councilor elections in special municipalities involve multi-member districts: They allow smaller parties to survive. Therefore, in the year-end municipality councilor elections, the KMT may have to compete not only with the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU), but also with the PFP and the NP.
This is the situation in Taipei City. Because of the cut in the number of seats for the other four municipalities and the difficulty the KMT and DPP will have dealing with this, many may turn to the TSU, the PFP or the NP. This could indirectly affect the mayoral elections.
In light of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) dwindling public support and the Cabinet’s poor performance, criticizing Ma is now popular with both political camps. The PFP and the NP could use this to their advantage, even forming a “grassroots service alliance” of township representatives and inviting PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) as a “consultant.” Though Soong has repeatedly pledged to withdraw from politics, the PFP is likely to play a role in the councilor elections.
Jan Shou-jung is a freelance writer.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to