Employers spying on employee instant messages; a police officer making unauthorized use of a police database to look up information about a woman romantically linked to a legislator; fraudulent telephone calls becoming the public’s No. 1 complaint — these recent news items all reflect a serious lack of attention paid to data privacy.
Advances in computer and information technology have, of course, made life more convenient. They have been helpful to the police in fighting crime. Instant messengers and other programs can make workplace communication much more efficient. TV shopping channels and online stores bring the convenience of shopping to the home.
The downside is that personal data privacy is threatened as never before. An inquisitive policeman can use a professional network to easily obtain someone’s personal information. An employer can monitor employee e-mails and other online activities at will. Personal data on consumers held by TV shopping channels and online stores can be leaked or fall into the hands of hackers and fraudsters. Who can we look to to protect our data privacy?
Take the case of the police officer who looked up details on the legislator’s girlfriend. The incident was uncovered in an investigation by the National Police Agency’s Information Management Center on its own initiative, but it seems likely that this was just the tip of the iceberg.
If citizen household registration data, tax records, health insurance details and other information can be found just as easily, similar cases are bound to keep cropping up. Can government departments be relied on to carry out internal checks? Who else will monitor whether they are doing their duty in regard to data security?
Aside from government departments, the potential for invasion of data privacy by private companies should be an even greater cause for concern.
Let us consider the case of employers who monitor their employees’ instant messages. Employers may well find it desirable or necessary to monitor use of the Internet and other electronic communications for various purposes, such as maintaining work efficiency — for example, by discouraging office staff from planting crops in virtual farms (a recent craze) — and protecting trade secrets. Monitoring may even conform with legal obligations, such as preventing sexual harassment.
But the employee’s right to privacy also needs to be protected. Privacy cases may be handled through arbitration or in courts of law, weighing up the interests of plaintiff and defendant, but would it not be better for departments concerned with such issues to take preventive measures by providing legally sound guidance and suggestions for employers to follow?
Similarly, instead of having thousands of police officers stand next to automatic teller machines all day and man the 165 fraud hotline, could the government not tackle the problem at its source by reinforcing the inspection of data protection by TV and Internet shopping firms?
The truth is that cases like these ceased to be “news” long ago, but the government has not come up with solutions. One reason is the pace of legislation. A draft personal data protection law proposed some time ago has not been passed. Another key point is the lack of a department or executive personnel dedicated to personal data protection.
Let us hope the government will take up chances offered by structural reform and the passage of the personal data law to incorporate “personal data ombudsmen” into executive departments, as suggested by human rights groups. That would be an effective response to privacy problems in our information-based society.
Liu Ting-chi is an assistant professor of law at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic