Pressure on Shezi Island
The decision to develop Shezi Island (社子島) in Taipei City as a new Manhattan is an example of short-sighted decision making (“CEPD passes Shezidao development plan,” Jan. 6, page 2). It shows that governments in Taiwan are not aware of, or planning for, the future impact of climate change.
In its Fourth Assessment Report in 2007, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicted that sea levels would rise between 18cm and 59cm by 2100. However, in recent years increased rates of melting in Greenland have led many scientists to believe these estimates are conservative.
Whatever the case, rising sea levels will pose a significant threat to Taipei and other coastal areas in Taiwan in the coming decades. It is essential that governments begin planning for this now.
It may be necessary to construct a barrier at the mouth of the Tamsui River (淡水河) soon to reduce flood risk. There is already a flood control barrier on the Thames in London.
Beefing up infrastructure is essential to reduce the risk of flooding. However, it is also necessary to halt further development in coastal areas that could be subject to inundation and flooding.
Massive development of one of Taipei’s most low-lying and flood-prone areas is a ridiculous idea. The only thing that Shezi Island may have in common with Manhattan in the future is that it will also have been inundated as a result of climate change.
DAVID REID
Sindian, Taipei County
The US’ second nature
Your Jan. 5 editorial “Afghanistan: Opportunity for Taiwan” on support for US military efforts needs a rethink.
For the last 40 years, Afghanistan has been trapped in civil wars and invasions, which are the direct result of the clumsiest interference by the US — either on its own or after choosing the ugliest of proxies to do its dirty work. Everything about this “mission” smells, and much worse.
It was second nature for the US to support the Republic of China when a notorious military government ruled this island. But ever since democracy bloomed in Taiwan, Washington has aided and abetted China in its relentless application of pressure on Taiwanese, resulting in the isolation and strangulation of this country for the sake of crass commercial interests in China and amid near total indifference to Taiwan’s welfare.
Throughout its history, the US has supported tyranny against freedom and has axiomatically retarded progressive change against the numerous thugs it installed as puppets around the world for its own diplomatic, economic and political self-interest.
That Taiwan might become a fall guy amid this litany of lies and deceit, and among Washington’s most disgusting predatory agendas, is totally unworthy of the place.
JOHN HANNA
Taoyuan
The ROC’s Y2K?
Will Taiwan have a “Y1C” computer glitch on Jan. 1, 2011, when the Republic of China (ROC) enters its 100th year? Some are already discussing this issue online.
Mark Spofford dubs the issue “Taiwan’s Y1C problem” on his Pinyin News blog. The year 1912 is the founding date of the ROC, of course, and since this year is year 99 in ROC parlance, next year will mark year 100.
Will the extra digit cause headaches for Taiwan’s computer systems handling bank transfers, university tuition, insurance premiums, medical records and driver’s license applications?
Some people say any Y1C problem might promote more debate about the relevance and practicality of the ROC calendar.
The countdown to 2011 — or year 100 — has already begun.
Will these problems, if any, be fixed in time?
DAN BLOOM
Chiayi
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese