On Dec. 25, Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波), one of the co-authors of Charter 08, was sentenced to 11 years in prison and deprived of his political rights for a further two years by the Chinese authorities on charges of “agitation activities aimed at subversion of the government.”
Charter 08 is a declaration that calls on the Chinese Communist Party to carry out political reforms, protect human rights, and implement democracy and the rule of law. The heavy sentence imposed on Liu for launching Charter 08 once more underlines the political differences between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait.
Liu incurred a heavy penalty simply for launching a petition. If a similar standard were applied in Taiwan, the million people who took part in the “red shirt” movement calling on then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to step down would probably all be guilty of the heinous crime of “subversion of the state” and would end up in jail.
The text of Charter 08 is easy to find on the Internet. It calls on the authorities to put into practice the two UN human rights covenants China signed in 1998 and to protect human rights, as required by the Constitution since an amendment in 2004. Charter 08 also urges authorities to gradually move toward democracy.
It says: “The ruling clique continues to insist on maintaining its authoritarian rule and fighting off political change. The results of this are official corruption, undermining of the rule of law, weak human rights, decay in public ethics, growing inequality between rich and poor, distorted economic development, and destruction of the natural, human and cultural environments. Citizens’ rights of freedom, property and the pursuit of happiness are not systematically guaranteed. All kinds of social contradictions keep building up, and discontent continues to mount. Above all, sharpening animosity between officials and ordinary people and, recently, a great increase in incidents of mass protest, indicate a disastrous trend that is getting out of hand.”
Why did Liu receive such a heavy sentence for a moderate political declaration that is just words on paper? How is this different from the literary inquisitions of feudal times? The people who signed Charter 08 did not take to the streets, nor have they formed an organized opposition to the ruling party. They are at most a quiet petitioning movement.
Liu is not the only victim of this ruling. The ruling, and the political system and mentality that lie behind it, may well hinder peaceful cross-strait development. Think about it: If the Chinese authorities refuse to change their ways, will the millions of people in Taiwan who support the values that Liu Xiaobo wants for China accept unification in any form?
How could the political conditions highlighted by Liu’s case have anything but a negative impact on cross-strait relations?
Most people in Taiwan want to see China move toward freedom and democracy. Surely President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who advocates peace and progress in cross-strait relations, wants the same thing. For the sake of cross-strait peace and progress, the Ma administration should not remain silent about cases like this. On the one hand, the government must show the public that it is determined to protect freedom and democracy. On the other, it must make clear to China where it stands on human rights.
Whatever Taiwan’s future, it must have the support of the majority of Taiwanese. If we want to promote peace, then we have to promote political progress in China.
Chen I-chung is an associate research fellow at the Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences at the Academia Sinica.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
In November last year, a man struck a woman with a steel bar and killed her outside a hospital in China’s Fujian Province. Later, he justified his actions to the police by saying that he attacked her because she was small and alone, and he was venting his anger after a dispute with a colleague. To the casual observer, it could be seen as another case of an angry man gone mad for a moment, but on closer inspection, it reflects the sad side of a society long brutalized by violent political struggles triggered by crude Leninism and Maoism. Starting
If social media interaction is any yardstick, India remained one of the top countries for Taiwan last year. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has on several occasions expressed enthusiasm to strengthen cooperation with India, one of the 18 target nations in her administration’s New Southbound Policy. The past year was instrumental in fostering Taiwan-India ties and will be remembered for accelerated momentum in bilateral relations. However, most of it has been confined to civil society circles. Even though Taiwan launched its southbound policy in 2016, the potential of Taiwan-India engagement remains underutilized. It is crucial to identify what is obstructing greater momentum
In terms of the economic outlook for the semiconductor industry, Taiwan has outperformed the rest of the world for three consecutive years. This is quite rare. In addition, Taiwan has been playing an important role in the US-China technology dispute, and both want Taiwan on their side, reflecting the remaking of the nation’s semiconductor industry. Under the leadership of — above all — Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the industry as a whole has shifted from a focus on capacity to a focus on quality, as companies now have to be able to provide integration of hardware and software, as well as
The US last week took action to remove most of the diplomatic red tape around US-Taiwan relations. While there have been adjustments in State Department “Guidelines on Relations with Taiwan” and other guidance before, no administration has ever so thoroughly dispensed with them. It is a step in the right direction. Of course, when there is a policy of formally recognizing one government (the People’s Republic of China or PRC) and not another (the Republic of China or ROC), officials from the top of government down need a systematic way of operationalizing the distinction. They cannot just make it up as