Why protests were justified
The demonstrations in Taichung against the cross-strait talks were extensively covered by media. The coverage in Monday’s lead story (“Nation rallies against Chiang-Chen talks,” Dec. 21, 2009, page 1) shows why the protests were justified.
In the past months, our dignity as Taiwanese has been sabotaged repeatedly by the government’s policies.
First, there is the matter of relaxing restrictions on US beef imports, a direct threat to public health. Next, there is the threat of global warming, yet the government’s emissions reduction policy is unclear, contributing to fact that many Taiwanese are ignorant or indifferent to climate change and the recent climate talks in Copenhagen.
The last straw is a proposed economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China.
More than 80 percent of Taiwanese are not sure what the ECFA entails, Democratic Progressive Party Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was quoted as saying in the same article. This shows the ruling party’s poor advocacy of its own policies.
The protests did not just target the cross-strait talks, but had a broader message, as Tsai said: “Taiwanese people are the masters of this land.”
The administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) should treat us with dignity. The public deserves to know what purpose policies serve and how they will impact the nation internationally. Many of the protesters in Taichung may not even have known what was to be discussed at the cross-strait talks.
MANDY CHOU
Taipei
Let’s be pragmatic
President Ma believes that an ECFA would improve bilateral trade with China and somehow allow Taiwan to gradually convince China to play fair by letting it join ASEAN Plus Three.
But we must remember that although China accounts for roughly 20 percent of the global population, the rest of the world is still bigger and more important than China. Taiwan should continue expanding into the international community and not put all its eggs in one basket.
MICHAEL TSAI
Tainan
Do your bit to save the world
A report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) says the concentration of carbon dioxide in the air hit 387 parts per million this year — a record high. That means humans are facing a bigger climate crisis than ever before.
The climate talks held in Copenhagen have drawn wide attention from media around the world. Some 45 national media around the globe ran editorials urging conference participants — especially key stakeholders such as the US, China and the EU — to reach a consensus to cut emissions.
It is the responsibility of every country in the world to take action on climate change, but can policies alone bring us clean air?
Saving the earth is everyone’s responsibility. The IPCC report predicted that the Arctic pack ice will disappear completely by the year 2100. Some people feel this is a problem for people alive 100 years from now, and so they consume without further thought.
A recent news report said some students at national universities are enormously wasteful. They leave their dorm rooms without turning out lights and leave the computer on while they sleep.
These students think energy is an all-you-can-eat buffet because it’s so cheap. But don’t forget, the price of energy isn’t just the bill in the mail, it’s the toll on our world’s future.
Now some students at National Taiwan University are setting a good example. They have organized a group called Green Superman to collect abandoned plastic bags for reuse. In the first three days alone they collected almost 20,000 plastic bags. The students have also set up plastic bag recycling bins in dorms.
The group has drawn public support, with some non-students helping out by bringing bags to the group.
No matter where you’re from, remember, fighting climate change is not just the responsibility of your country’s leaders. Everyone has a role to play.
JESSICA SU
Taipei
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —