Ahead of the next round of cross-strait talks in Taichung later this month, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has suggested that visiting Chinese officials be arrested and tried for criminal conduct in China, particularly for human rights abuses. China being what it is, there is a rich selection of such people, and the DPP, if it had its way, could make merry from blocking such officials from visiting Taiwan.
This idea is idealistic but impractical, if not nonsensical. But it does reopen debate on what level of accountability Chinese officials visiting Taiwan should be subjected to. Given that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to this day considers itself to be the most able organization to govern China, and given that Taiwan is supposedly part of China, why would such flotsam not be held accountable for abuses committed against Chinese nationals?
Once again the irony rears its head: The DPP asks a question that inadvertently requires careful thought on the future of cross-strait relations, and the KMT fails to answer it. For the KMT, on every front, on every occasion, economics is the key that will open the door to mutual prosperity and a lasting peace.
This, of course, fails to address the myriad factors that threaten peace in China — from within.
There is a large number of things that the KMT can do to address the legitimate interests of the Chinese people, whether or not Taiwanese are considered among their number. Yet the KMT is barely cognizant of the potential role that Taiwan can — and should — play in China if it is to live up to its purported role of beacon for ordinary Chinese.
Cross-strait ties must learn how to walk before they can run. Trade and financial liberalization is the obvious first step for two countries with economies already closely tied and, thus far, mutually beneficial.
But whatever economic reward or damage might result from this month’s talks, nothing can change the fact that Taiwan’s government offers nothing resembling a policy on how to deal with every other aspect of China, of which politics is a large component, but only one component.
Similarly, when foreign organizations such as the European Chamber of Commerce Taipei (ECCT) uncritically laud more intimate ties with the Chinese, caution is warranted. This is not because of the dangers inherent in closer economic ties — though these are substantial — but because the process of detente requires opening channels of communication in much more sensitive areas that only begin with politics. On such unavoidable issues — what role should Taiwan play in democratizing China and empowering ordinary Chinese? — the silence of the ECCT has been salutary: Give us the benefits, it seems to say, and the little people can worry about the rest, if they can be bothered.
As the debate over the form and intensity of contact with China continues, the problem of addressing social issues in China will be one that Taiwanese political parties will not be able to ignore.
The problem with the KMT and the DPP is that, in a classic mix of ideology and irony, both parties are entirely uninterested in social issues in China, with the exception of relief for natural disasters, but even this focus is motivated by political concerns and not the fate of the common man.
If such ignorance and parochialism continues, Taiwan will be the loser — whoever is in power, and whatever policies are in place.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
RSS