Somewhere in the mountain fastness of Afghanistan or in the remote wilds of northwestern Pakistan, leaders of the Taliban insurgents and al-Qaeda terrorists have been poring over US President Barack Obama’s speech on the Afghan war and the statements of his advisers this week to determine their own strategy for the next 18 months.
It’s a good bet they will decide to fade into the hills or to disappear into the 40,000 villages spread across a land larger than Texas. There they will heal their wounds, retrain guerrillas and wait until the Yankees begin to go home as Obama has promised.
For that is what the president has decreed despite the hedging language in his speech and subsequent statements from advisers about depending on conditions in Afghanistan. US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates was explicit in testimony before a congressional committee, asserting that in July 2011 there would begin “a gradual — but inexorable — process” of withdrawing US troops.
The July 2011 date is roughly halfway between today and the elections of November 2012 when the voters and taxpayers, already weary of the Iraq and Afghan wars, will surely be demanding that the troops be withdrawn — and will vote for whoever agrees. That will set the deadline in political concrete.
The strategy outlined by the president at the US Military Academy at West Point had many audiences — the US public, Democrats to the left and Republicans to the right of the president, military men and women who must fight the war, the rulers and peoples of Afghanistan and Pakistan, allies in NATO and elsewhere.
Everyone, however, seems to have ignored the Taliban insurgents and al-Qaeda terrorists who have a say in how the conflict in Afghanistan plays out. Neither Obama nor Gates nor the others in the national security team appear to have taken them into account.
Only an unidentified “senior administration official” briefing the press addressed this issue — and he brushed it aside.
“If the Taliban think they can wait us out, I think that they’re misjudging the president’s approach,” he said.
“It may be misinterpreted, but the Taliban will do that at its own risk,” he said.
That official, however, did not explain what the administration would do if, indeed, the Taliban laid low and enticed the US into believing it was successful by reducing attacks on US, allied and Afghan government forces. History is on the side of the Taliban as Sun Tzu (孫子), the Chinese strategist, wrote 2,500 years ago that the warrior “skilled in defense hides in the most secret recesses of the earth.”
More recently, General Vo Nguyen Giap, who led North Vietnamese forces during the Vietnam War, said a key to their success was to “refuse to give battle likely to incur losses to us.”
Colonel Harry Summers, a US pioneer in assessing US mistakes in Vietnam, said the North Vietnamese saw US public support evaporating: “Now all they had to do was wait us out.”
Going underground has many precedents among the Muslims of Central Asia. A Pakistani who has written widely on that region, Ahmed Rashid, has pointed out that many Muslims sought to escape Soviet repression by going underground not only in Afghanistan but in Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and other Soviet-controlled states.
Greg Mortenson, a US activist who has built schools in Afghanistan and Pakistan, said people there and Americans have different senses of time. Once he grumbled when things didn’t move fast enough. A friend wrote: “Haji Ali put his hand on Mortenson’s shoulder, and gave his impatient American a fatherly squeeze.”
“I thank all-merciful Allah for all you have done,” the friend wrote. “But the people of Korphe have been here without a school for six hundred years. What is one winter more?”
Richard Halloran is a freelance writer based in Hawaii.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS