During a political talk show on Oct. 19, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Central Standing Committee member and Tainan City Councilor Hsieh Lung-chieh (謝龍介) used the words “ass-shake diplomacy” to criticize Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chu (陳菊) as “a woman’s liaison with China” and her trip to Beijing as “ass-shaking.”
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Taipei City Councilor Hsu Chia-ching (徐佳青), who was also a guest on the talk show, protested against these inappropriate comments, but Hsieh did not stop his verbal attacks and said even nastier things on the nationally broadcast program.
The Taipei Association for the Promotion of Women’s Rights (TAPWR) believes that verbal abuse referring to differences in physiology and gender highlights a misconception about gender that has long existed in Taiwan. This is based on the mistaken belief that verbal abuse does not constitute violence, as well as confusion between formal and substantive equality.
Violence is loathsome and terrifying not only because of the direct effects physical violence has on life and health, but also because it represents the power to control and endanger the freedom of its victims, their safety, existence and further development. Verbal abuse in essence represents the exact same deprivation of rights and psychological oppression that physical violence does.
Comments like “ass-shake diplomacy” emphasize the bodily characteristics of a certain individual or group to dismiss their positive qualities and the unique skills they employ in their social roles, as well as the public character that such roles should possess. Language that discriminates against gender by way of insults and denigration is an undeniable form of violence.
Hsieh’s comments were a clear attempt to use Chen’s physical characteristics as a woman to avoid commenting on her professional abilities as a politician or getting into a debate on public policy. This was not only an encroachment on Chen’s rights, but also dealt a blow to public deliberation on social policy issues.
In 2007, Taiwan ratified the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), a code for the protection of the rights of women. In its preamble, the CEDAW states: “Despite these various instruments, extensive discrimination against women continues to exist, recalling that discrimination against women violates the principles of equality of rights and respect for human dignity, is an obstacle to the participation of women, on equal terms with men, in the political, social, economic and cultural life of their countries, hampers the growth of the prosperity of society and the family and makes more difficult the full development of the potentialities of women in the service of their countries and of humanity.”
The TAPWR therefore calls for recognition of the fact that verbal abuse is an outward expression of gender discrimination and violence in the home. If we want to enjoy the right to liberty, security and freedom from fear, then we should demand that political parties and the legislature abide by CEDAW to stop discriminatory remarks based on a woman’s physicality or their private affairs and that a system be set up to deal with these issues. Moreover, this system should take precedence over party concerns and should not be compromised in return for superficial verbal apologies or tolerance for such behavior.
Cheng Kai-jung is deputy secretary-general of the Taipei Association for the Promotion of Women’s Rights. Lin Hsin-yeh is a consultant at the association.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS