A friend in China recently voiced concern over Taiwan’s recent disaster and said it was a pity tourists were unable to visit Alishan (阿里山). My friend then surprised me by saying they could instead view landslide dams caused by the flooding and suggested that Taiwan’s mountainous areas may have become a “land of a thousand lakes.”
I didn’t know how to react. President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) incompetence is now well known; but this was the first I had heard about landslide dams becoming a “tourist attraction.” Judging from the Post-Typhoon Morakot Reconstruction Special Act (莫拉克颱風災後重建特別條例) passed on Thursday, it seems Taiwan really could become covered in countless landslide dams.
The Act sets the limit for disaster relief and reconstruction at NT$120 billion (US$3.6 billion), but how will this money be allocated? No explanations are given. We only know that it will not be restricted by the Budget Act (預算法).
The Act also states that the money cannot be restricted by the Banking Act (銀行法), the Labor Standards Act (勞基法), the Employment Insurance Act (就業保險法), the Labor Pension Act (勞工退休金條例) or the National Property Act (國有財產法).
In addition, it ignores laws related to homeland security, including the Water Act (水利法), the Soil and Water Conservation Act (水土保持法), the Environmental Impact Assessment Act (環境影響評估法) and land regulation and forest protection acts.
Even worse, the Act includes no definition of disaster zones and victims, nor does it offer any explanation. This means that development and construction agencies will be able to expand the interpretation of these definitions. Inappropriate development is why the floods caused by Typhoon Morakot resulted in so many deaths in the first place.
The act will make it much easier to annul legal protection for disaster zones and allow projects like the relocation of villages, temporary shelters, roads, bridges and river dredging to bypass environmental assessments and deliberation procedures. It will thus open up mountainous and coastal areas so that the use of the NT$120 billion will become a force for creating countless landslide dams. The Act should rather be called a “sustainable disaster act.”
On the other hand, after last year’s earthquake in Sichuan, China adopted the Regulations on Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Rehabilitation and Reconstruction (汶川地震災後恢復重建條例) on June 4 last year. The regulations have 80 articles setting forth clear directions for the division of duties and responsibilities for the various stages of reconstruction work, including temporary shelter placement, investigations and assessments, recovery and reconstruction planning and implementation, fundraising, government assistance as well as monitoring and management.
The regulations were clearly and logically arranged and emphasized environmental protection, as well as demanding high standards of construction and prioritizing public safety.
Taiwan’s reconstruction act, on the other hand, does not include information on the various stages — like investigation and evaluation, planning and monitoring and management — nor does it make any demands for the upkeep of the environment, ecology or quality of construction.
It merely calls for things to be reconstructed.
Relief efforts have highlighted government incompetence, while reconstruction plans have exposed the ability of a bunch of savages to damage homeland security and how a group of greedy individuals are hoping to make exorbitant profits off of a national disaster.
Both of these groups are ensuring that Taiwan’s next disaster will be even worse.
Jay Fang is the chairman of the Green Consumers’ Foundation.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence