Since assuming office, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his administration have aggressively promoted China-leaning economic policies, including direct transport links, Chinese tourism and Chinese investment in the stock and real estate markets.
With opportunism on the rise and under an economic shadow, the Taiwanese public is gradually becoming dependent on China, if not addicted, and may become subject to manipulation by the Chinese government.
The reason the Ma administration has managed to deceive a number of people with its policies is that it is has been calling for a separation of politics and economics, and has claimed that economic exchanges between Taiwan and China do not have to be political.
The government has gone so far as to say that controversial issues can be put aside, and that this means the public would not have to worry that Taiwan might lose its sovereignty, national identity and autonomy in the process.
It is a discourse that is both deceitful and dangerous.
Ma’s rhetoric of separating politics from economics has two pillars.
First, China’s economic power is so strong that it will not only help Taiwan ride out the financial crisis, but also bring the nation prosperity.
Second, China is a philanthropic state that asks for nothing in return; its economic activities relating to Taiwan are constructive and have no political connotations.
These presumptions are demonstrably wrong. For this reason, it is surprising that the Ma administration has managed to avoid stronger public dissatisfaction for failing to boost the economy since taking office more than a year ago.
On the other hand, the public has little choice but to sit on the driftwood of Ma’s policies through a once-in-a-century financial storm even if they know that it is a charade.
China has progressed to a certain extent after 30 years of reform, but its economic power has an aura only because its population accounts for one-fifth of humanity.
Even if average income per capita in China does not sit among the world’s well-to-do, this number multiplied by 1.3 billion is formidable and seductive.
When the term “BRIC” — Brazil, Russia, India and China — was coined to cover the economic entities with the most potential for development, the acronym was accompanied by a new bout of received wisdom that China’s GDP would soon surpass Germany’s and Japan’s to become the second-largest in the world.
Others chimed in by saying that China would overtake the US within 20 years.
This discourse deliberately ignored the huge discrepancy between national populations and intentionally highlighted comparisons that were calculated using different standards. China’s average income per capita is one-twentieth of the US’ and one-tenth of Taiwan’s. How could Taiwan pin its hopes on a country with a national income that in per capita terms is extraordinarily small?
Second, China’s economic infiltration of Taiwan has never been free of political motivations and intentions. Although China often avoids talking about politics in the context of Taiwan, it always employs political strategy.
Examples of this are direct transport links and the opening up of Taiwan to Chinese tourism.
In one year, Taiwanese tourist arrivals in China reached 4 million, while only around 300,000 Chinese visited Taiwan. The government, however, was reluctant to use this as leverage and demand that China respect Taiwan’s sovereignty and national identity and engage with it on an equal footing. Instead, China did so — requesting that Taiwan open up the Taiwan Strait median line.
In another example, Taiwanese tourists in China would never dare ask Chinese hotels or restaurants to display the Republic of China’s national flag, yet some stores in Taiwan’s more scenic locations have displayed the flag of the People’s Republic of China and have posted signs in simplified Chinese characters to pander to these 300,000 tourists.
Taiwan is suffering from the global financial crisis and has still sent millions of tourists to China. Yet a few hundred thousand Chinese tourists in Taiwan shamelessly state to reporters that they have come to “save” the local economy.
This imbalance means that as Taiwan exports its hard-earned money, Chinese in Taiwan barely make inroads into Taiwan’s tourism pie.
Yet the government still regards Chinese tourism as a panacea for the economy.
Not only is this government fatuous and incompetent, its conduct is also humiliating and compromises the nation’s sovereignty.
From the beginning, China’s policies on Taiwan have been political and economic. During a visit to the US last month, the director of China’s Taiwan Affairs Office, Wang Yi (王毅), said that the point of cross-strait relations was not to separate economic and political issues but to determine the correct priorities.
In other words, in the end, China wants to achieve political goals. If Beijing temporarily avoids discussing political issues, this is a strategy designed to protect its trump card and to avoid frightening ordinary Taiwanese.
As soon as Taiwan leans toward China to the extent that most believe Taiwan cannot live without its neighbor, China will begin political negotiations and the whole sordid agenda will become apparent.
By that time, it will be too late for regret.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
When Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) wakes up one morning and decides that his People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can win a war to conquer Taiwan, that is when his war will begin. To ensure that Xi never gains that confidence it is now necessary for the United States to shed any notions of “forbearance” in arms sales to Taiwan. Largely because they could guarantee military superiority on the Taiwan Strait, US administrations from Jimmy Carter to Barack Obama practiced “forbearance” — pre-emptive limitation of arms sales to Taiwan — in hopes of gaining diplomatic leverage with Beijing. President Ronald
Communist China’s Global Times warned US President Joe Biden in the first week of this month that he “should make a significant response to China’s sincerity within his first 100 days, as the sincerity and patience will not last forever.” In fact, they lasted only days. By the end of the week, Beijing had laid down the law, so to speak, to the Biden administration. First was a speech billed as a “Dialogue with National Committee on US-China Relations,” by Yang Jiechi (楊潔篪), director of China’s Office of the Central Commission for Foreign Affairs. Yang said he was pleased “to have
Three years ago, former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Yeh Yi-jin (葉宜津) raised quite a few eyebrows when she proposed abolishing Taiwan’s zhuyin fuhao (注音符號, Mandarin phonetic symbols commonly known as “Bopomofo”) system in her bid to become Tainan mayor. Yeh did not make it onto the ballot, and it was not clear how she would have begun to implement such a gargantuan change locally. Not only is Bopomofo learned by all schoolchildren in Taiwan, it is the most popular system for typing Chinese in the nation, despite being considered one of the least efficient input methods. Bopomofo has also become
The Canadian parliament on Monday passed a motion saying that China’s human rights abuses against the country’s Uighur Muslim population in Xinjiang constitute “genocide.” Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has so far avoided using the word genocide in regard to Xinjiang, but if he did, it would begin to generate solidarity among G7 nations on the issue — which is something Trudeau has called for. Former US president Donald Trump used the word genocide regarding Xinjiang before leaving office last month, and members of US President Joe Biden’s administration have been pushing for him to make the same declaration, a Reuters report