National Security Council Secretary-General Su Chi (蘇起) has a problem.
First, his wife Chen Yue-ching (陳月卿) went on a book promotion tour to China. Now, his brother Su Yung-chin (蘇永欽) is set to take up a visiting professorship at Zhejiang University in Hangzhou.
Su’s wife and brother are not civil servants, so is harm inflicted if they travel to China on professional business? Are these matters of national security?
The Presidential Office says not.
The problem is that Su Chi is the man entrusted with maintaining national security — and defining its parameters. When members of his immediate and extended family travel to China for business or to teach while others are restricted from doing so, ordinary people have every right to be cynical if the government sits by and does nothing.
Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) Chairman Chiang Pin-kung’s (江丙坤) son was criticized for doing business in China — not least for probable conflict of interest. The fallout of this led President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to say that public sentiment must be taken into account — and Chiang almost left the SEF.
People close to former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (連戰) are suspected of conflict of interest. There are also concerns that KMT members participating in KMT-Chinese Communist Party negotiations are using the forum to advance their personal and financial interests.
After Chen’s book promotion in China embarrassed her husband and made trouble for the government, Ma said this kind of incident would “never happen again.” Yet the Presidential Office knew of Su Yung-chin’s offer from Zhejiang University before it became public and said nothing.
It seems neither a conflict of interest nor the perception of one is of concern to the Ma government — even on matters of national security — unless there is a sufficiently large backlash in the media.
Yet the feeling that basic principles of national security can be casually flouted may pose a challenge to Ma’s leadership as time goes on.
After KMT hack Hsu Shu-po (�?�) was allegedly promised the position of chairman of Taipei 101 in exchange for not running for Yunlin County commissioner, the Presidential Office sensed that the backlash would be too great — regardless of the truth of the matter — and might lead to legal action over inducement involving electoral processes. Within hours the Presidential Office told the Cabinet to withdraw the appointment.
But when Ma hinted at the possibility of KMT Chairman Wu Poh-hsiung’s (吳伯雄) son taking the Taoyuan County commissioner’s post — just as Wu vacated his own post for the president — no one in the party suggested that inducement was involved.
Ma came to power partly on the understanding that he opposed the erosion of good governance, yet here we are, one year on, and a culture of privilege and hubris is being revitalized. In such a climate, even a responsible leader will struggle to look clean.
Su Yung-chin has an exceptional academic record — and is a former chairman of the National Communications Commission. He thus has many ways to make a living, which raises the question as to why he, like Su Chi’s wife, would go to China when he knew it would create problems for the president.
The answer is he and Su Chi’s wife knew it was highly likely they could do so without intervention — and that they might even be congratulated for their efforts.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS