During the past several months, many local companies have seen their share prices plunge amid the global financial crisis. Some business heavyweights who had refrained from running daily operations themselves returned to reinvigorate the companies they built.
One of the latest examples is Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co chairman Morris Chang (張忠謀), who announced on June 11 that he would return as chief executive officer, replacing Rick Tsai (蔡力行), who was appointed president of a new business division to focus on green energy development.
Chang’s return to address the company’s needs during the downturn followed a similar decision by Hon Hai Precision Industry Co chairman Terry Gou (郭台銘), who had intended to retire last year but told shareholders in April that he would not retire until he sees a recovery in the company’s share prices.
The same also applied to Asustek Computer Inc chairman Johnny Shih (施崇棠). After the company posted a loss of NT$2.8 billion (US$85 million) in the last quarter of last year — the first ever quarterly loss in the company’s 19 years of operations — Shih took back the reins from his top executives, hoping his stewardship of the company would help Asustek realize its full potential and improve competitiveness.
Few investors have expressed doubts about the managerial skill and entrepreneurial spirit of these top executives as they seek to maintain their business’ growth during the financial turmoil.
However, the unanimous consent these company founders’ have enjoyed as they return to the frontlines has only raised concerns. The market is still too impressed by the success of these great leaders, far less confident in their handpicked successors and downright worried if no clear succession plans are in sight.
The legends of these founders are packed with tales of their management decisions, innovative vision, market strategy and much else. But no one lives forever. At the end of the day, investors still have to ask who is going to take the helm when the founders are no longer available.
When Formosa Plastics Group founder Wang Yung-ching (王永慶) passed away last October at the age of 91, investor confidence was shaken by fears that the group’s business planning and operations would decline without its spiritual leader.
But in recent months, share prices of the group’s major subsidiaries have stabilized and it appears that investors have come to accept the fact that the group is now run without the legendary founder by a seven-member management committee — composed of his daughters, his siblings and executives — formed in 2006 at Wang’s retirement.
Arguably, the recent legal disputes between one of Wang’s sons and his family members over Wang’s fortune have seemed to further strengthen the group’s collective leadership, rather than weaken it. But it is too early to tell if the firm’s collective leadership will prevail and have a real impact on the corporate culture in Taiwan.
No one is in a position to judge the founders at TSMC, Hon Hai, Asustek or elsewhere as they return to tackle the economic crisis. But the issue provides us a chance to reconsider whether in Taiwanese culture, a great company can’t do without a “strongman” type of leadership. Perhaps we should ask ourselves: When Taiwan has seen local companies perform well globally and compete with rivals using international standards, what do we really believe about developing leadership? Do we have the courage to accept a new kind of leader?
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
The National Immigration Agency on Tuesday said it had notified some naturalized citizens from China that they still had to renounce their People’s Republic of China (PRC) citizenship. They must provide proof that they have canceled their household registration in China within three months of the receipt of the notice. If they do not, the agency said it would cancel their household registration in Taiwan. Chinese are required to give up their PRC citizenship and household registration to become Republic of China (ROC) nationals, Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said. He was referring to Article 9-1 of the Act
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
RSS