During the past several months, many local companies have seen their share prices plunge amid the global financial crisis. Some business heavyweights who had refrained from running daily operations themselves returned to reinvigorate the companies they built.
One of the latest examples is Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co chairman Morris Chang (張忠謀), who announced on June 11 that he would return as chief executive officer, replacing Rick Tsai (蔡力行), who was appointed president of a new business division to focus on green energy development.
Chang’s return to address the company’s needs during the downturn followed a similar decision by Hon Hai Precision Industry Co chairman Terry Gou (郭台銘), who had intended to retire last year but told shareholders in April that he would not retire until he sees a recovery in the company’s share prices.
The same also applied to Asustek Computer Inc chairman Johnny Shih (施崇棠). After the company posted a loss of NT$2.8 billion (US$85 million) in the last quarter of last year — the first ever quarterly loss in the company’s 19 years of operations — Shih took back the reins from his top executives, hoping his stewardship of the company would help Asustek realize its full potential and improve competitiveness.
Few investors have expressed doubts about the managerial skill and entrepreneurial spirit of these top executives as they seek to maintain their business’ growth during the financial turmoil.
However, the unanimous consent these company founders’ have enjoyed as they return to the frontlines has only raised concerns. The market is still too impressed by the success of these great leaders, far less confident in their handpicked successors and downright worried if no clear succession plans are in sight.
The legends of these founders are packed with tales of their management decisions, innovative vision, market strategy and much else. But no one lives forever. At the end of the day, investors still have to ask who is going to take the helm when the founders are no longer available.
When Formosa Plastics Group founder Wang Yung-ching (王永慶) passed away last October at the age of 91, investor confidence was shaken by fears that the group’s business planning and operations would decline without its spiritual leader.
But in recent months, share prices of the group’s major subsidiaries have stabilized and it appears that investors have come to accept the fact that the group is now run without the legendary founder by a seven-member management committee — composed of his daughters, his siblings and executives — formed in 2006 at Wang’s retirement.
Arguably, the recent legal disputes between one of Wang’s sons and his family members over Wang’s fortune have seemed to further strengthen the group’s collective leadership, rather than weaken it. But it is too early to tell if the firm’s collective leadership will prevail and have a real impact on the corporate culture in Taiwan.
No one is in a position to judge the founders at TSMC, Hon Hai, Asustek or elsewhere as they return to tackle the economic crisis. But the issue provides us a chance to reconsider whether in Taiwanese culture, a great company can’t do without a “strongman” type of leadership. Perhaps we should ask ourselves: When Taiwan has seen local companies perform well globally and compete with rivals using international standards, what do we really believe about developing leadership? Do we have the courage to accept a new kind of leader?
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Before the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can blockade, invade, and destroy the democracy on Taiwan, the CCP seeks to make the world an accomplice to Taiwan’s subjugation by harassing any government that confers any degree of marginal recognition, or defies the CCP’s “One China Principle” diktat that there is no free nation of Taiwan. For United States President Donald Trump’s upcoming May 14, 2026 visit to China, the CCP’s top wish has nothing to do with Trump’s ongoing dismantling of the CCP’s Axis of Evil. The CCP’s first demand is for Trump to cease US
RSS