The 62nd session of the World Health Assembly (WHA), the WHO’s highest decision-making body, is scheduled for today to Friday in Geneva, Switzerland. Taiwan has been blocked by China from joining the WHO over the past 12 years. This year, Beijing has agreed to let a representative of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government attend the WHA. The question is what price Taiwan will have to pay. The government has not made this clear to the public.
Beijing has employed a “carrot and stick” policy to block Taiwan from participating in the WHO. It has spread false information in the international community, claiming that the Chinese government attaches great importance to the rights and health of Taiwanese and that it is willing to cooperate with Taipei to solve health issues through appropriate channels. At the same time, it has repeatedly claimed that Taiwan is part of China and thus unqualified to join the WHO as an independent and sovereign state or to attend the WHA under any name.
China claims that Taiwan participating in the WHO would be a violation not only of UN Resolution No. 2758 but also of a resolution at the 25th session of the WHA in 1972. By this distorted reasoning, regardless of whether Taiwan applies to the WHO secretary-general for WHO membership as a country or, with the help of allies, seeks an invitation to participate in the WHA as an observer using the name “Republic of China (Taiwan),” Taipei would be creating “two Chinas” or “one China, one Taiwan.”
This would encroach on China’s sovereignty and interfere with its internal affairs, Beijing claims.
Since Ma took office, his administration has hoped that its diplomatic truce policy would elicit goodwill from China. Instead, the government’s retreat and compromise can best be described as Taiwan gives an inch and Beijing takes a mile.
By accepting the ridiculous title “Chinese Taipei,” the government has been granted observer status at the WHA through an act of charity by Beijing. This model — with China unilaterally deciding Taiwan’s participation in exchange for Taiwan’s self-denigration and sacrifice of its status as a sovereign state — has undermined our national interests. It is nothing short of a tacit confirmation to the international community that Taiwan is part of China.
If Taiwan wants to join the WHO, it should insist on admission as a full member under the name “Taiwan.” Securing membership under the name “Chinese Taipei” or any other title that belittles Taiwanese sovereignty is unacceptable.
To break through China’s diplomatic blockade, Taiwan should clearly state that it is an independent and sovereign country. The public should not tolerate the government kowtowing to Beijing or selling out national sovereignty in exchange for observer status at the WHA.
The public should protest government policies that harm Taiwan’s dignity and sovereignty.
Chen Lung-chu is the president of the Taiwan New Century Foundation.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Since the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has taken Taiwanese students to visit China and invited Chinese students to Taiwan. Ma calls those activities “cross-strait exchanges,” yet the trips completely avoid topics prohibited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), such as democracy, freedom and human rights — all of which are universal values. During the foundation’s most recent Chinese student tour group, a Fudan University student used terms such as “China, Taipei” and “the motherland” when discussing Taiwan’s recent baseball victory. The group’s visit to Zhongshan Girls’ High School also received prominent coverage in
Late on Tuesday evening, South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol declared martial law. A BBC analysis cited as reasons the opposition parties’ majority in the National Assembly, their continued boycott of the national budget and the impeachment of key officials and prosecutors, leading to frequent government gridlock. During the years that Taiwan and South Korea traveled the road to democratization, our countries hit many potholes. Taiwan cannot return to the Martial Law era. Despite the similarities in our authoritarian past, Yoon’s political travails are far removed from the issues Taiwan faces. Yoon’s actions are a wake-up call to the world about
RSS