It’s rather like cursing in church, or copulating on the Queen’s lawn. No good opinions, I know, will come of it. But how do you start your digital week? With junk, with spam, with a standard crop of 58 e-mails offering to “energize my baby-maker,” prevent “death by swine flu,” and dispense “scintillating orgasms” to all and sundry. Welcome to the 21st century, and a great deal of what we hate about it. Impotence, disease, frustration.
And such starts, on examination, do not get better. Just sit down and consider the most dire dishes of the day. Shall we obsessively discuss the death of newspapers, the end of five centuries of print? Or maybe we could go one worse and ponder the demise of books themselves, a bonfire of our literary heritage turned to ashes by Kindle? There’s porn and pedophilia, of course: giant helpings of fear and disgust on demand. There’s terrorism and the latest sinister warnings from Osama and Co. There’s the end of civilized life as we know it.
Whatever happened to community? Walk any high street and you’ll see the shutters coming down. Remember the ghosts of Woolworths past and sniffle nostalgia. Traditional, human Britain is closing for business — just like a globe where bank failures spread like viruses and viruses spread like bank failures. Will leaders arise to rescue and inspire us afresh? Not British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, alas, the man with the toxic grin. Not those who serve and defend him most zealously. Not our parliament and its elected representatives, buying bath plugs and toilet seats on Joe Public.
This is surely the way the world really ends: not with a bang, but with surges of nausea amid mounting heat, rising seas and carbon despair. Can mankind somehow be saved? Well, we could always switch the damned computer off.
For the Web we work on, the digital connections our government now seeks to spread as a universal right, the keyboards in our studies and living rooms, are blights as well as boons, misery-makers as well as enablers. We won’t automatically be better with no books to finger and caress, or shops to sell them, Amazoned out of existence. We aren’t better for grisly YouTube grimaces from Downing Street, or US President Barack Obama twittering away when he could be thinking instead. Before there were computer disks to steal from the fees office, there was privacy, secrecy and supposed decency undisturbed.
Before there were computer disks to nick, nobody cared how many houses British Member of Parliament Hazel Blears could score in a year. Before e-mail, there was no former Brown adviser Damian McBride hawking his poison from screen to screen. And it becomes increasingly necessary to weigh the revolution that has changed all our lives on an updated set of moral scales.
The figures aren’t definitive, to be sure. We can’t be certain how much energy will go into 10 minutes of Google searching. We can’t blankly endorse the Gartner company analysis that put the IT industry worldwide in the same energy-using bracket as airlines. We can probably argue a bit about Stanford University estimates that show US Internet usage either overtaking the energy levels of all color TVs in the US or devouring the equivalent of two months’ worth of UK electricity. We can question posited rates of Web expansion in the crunch and hope that technology will get us off the hook when the bills for digital power get back to growing at 10 percent a year.
But let’s not pretend that there isn’t a problem. Let’s acknowledge, in the words of one highly experienced processor designer, that there is indeed “a possibility that computer equipment power consumption spiraling out of control could have serious consequences for the overall affordability of computing, not to mention the overall health of the planet.” Let’s get a real challenge out in the open.
Walk or bike to work instead of getting out the car? Of course. Learn the complex routines for recycling bins? Hopefully. Think before leaving on the next jet plane? Naturally. But what’s the use of worrying and wondering about a wilting world when Susan Boyle videos by the zillion are clogging up YouTube, when life is a deluge of puerile twitters and bilious blogs?
I know the Web is a wonder beyond compare. I work on it for hours every day. I can’t be without it (via laptop, BlackBerry or iPhone). But I’m also glumly aware that it brings despond in its train, that much of what irks us most is digital cause and effect. Discuss? No, we don’t want to know. Just like the blogger who won’t think about electricity demand because “Oh yawn! ... it’s government’s job to supply that demand” — just like spammers with scintillating orgasms for sale.
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic