On Friday, the National Communications Commission (NCC) called a public hearing to discuss the takeover of the China Times group by Want Want China Holdings Ltd (中國旺旺控股). It was a rushed hearing with too many restrictions on public participation, making it impossible to measure public opinion.
The NCC should hold more hearings and allow a detailed investigation into the source of Want Want Group’s capital and shareholding structure, as well as the effect of cross-media management on market competition and public interests.
The conflict over the China Times (中國時報), China Television (CTV, 中視), and CTiTV (中天電視) began with calls for political parties, government and the military to withdraw from the media, which resulted in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) transferring its holdings in the China Times and the Broadcasting Corporation of China (中廣) to former China Times chairman Albert Yu (余建新), thus creating cross-media management.
The first-term NCC handled the case by passively referring to “formal external legality” to bypass the ban on cross-media management of newspapers and radio or TV stations in the enforcement rules of the Radio and Television Act (廣播電視法).
The shareholding structure announced by the NCC shows that Want Want chairman Tsai Eng-meng (蔡衍明), by buying shares through two family-owned enterprises, now owns 100 percent of the China Times, 68.12 percent of shares in CtiTV and 44.5 percent of CTV.
It is clear that his shareholdings flout regulations in the Radio and Television Act on cross-media ownership. As stipulated by Articles 18 and 19 of the Act’s enforcement rules, Tsai has declared that these are his private investments. But the application form gives the family-owned enterprises as the shareholders, thus raising the question of whether restrictions applying to natural or to legal persons should be used. In practice, Tsai owns all three media outlets, and he is dispelling any doubt by stressing ownership of the three companies in all internal and external statements.
As far as readers, viewers and employees are concerned, Want Want at present controls the influence wielded by these three media outlets; it is not a future possibility being investigated by the NCC. Under the former ownership of the Yu family, we saw the combined power wielded by the three outlets, with strong promotion of the family’s programs in the news, as well as news content being determined by the group’s business interests.
Today, the Want Want logo is used by the three media outlets and on reporters’ name cards, clearly displaying cross-media ownership. In terms of content, the development toward unitary and positive reporting on China and the Taiwanese government is harming the rights of both media workers and readers and viewers.
Want Want’s simultaneous ownership of these three media outlets violates the spirit of legislation aimed at protecting fair competition and the public interest. We therefore call on the NCC to reject this change in stock ownership.
The NCC should also use the investigation of this case to establish a set of transparent procedures and strict standards for investigating media mergers and conduct a review of shortcomings in legislation and policies. This is the only way to safeguard fair and orderly market competition, the diversification of media content, the rights and interest of readers and viewers and the right of media workers to be independent.
Hung Chen-ling is an assistant professor at National Taiwan University’s Graduate Institute of Journalism. Chad Liu is an assistant professor at National Chung Cheng University’s Department of Communications.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic