Markings matter
The article you printed on demands by student gay and lesbian groups (“Gay, lesbian groups call for public restroom equity,” May 4, page 2) brought up some issues that university and other officials should consider before making rash policy decisions.
If student activist leaders Tsai Pi-jung (蔡璧嶸) and “Strawberry” think that restrooms designated as “men’s rooms” or “women’s rooms” create a lot of trouble for the tiny percentage of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (GLBT) students, just imagine how much more confusion (and needless harassment and embarrassment) markings with toilets and/or urinals would create for the vast majority of non-GLBT students.
While a urinal marking would clearly indicate a males-only restroom, what about a restroom with only a toilet marking or with both toilet and urinal markings? After all, men don’t just use urinals in public restrooms.
Men who need to use a toilet might understandably feel apprehensive knowing that a restroom with a toilet or toilet/urinal marking is also designated for women’s use. Similarly, would women feel comfortable knowing that any restroom they use might have male users inside?
We might reason that, if such a marking system were to be used, users would in time deduce that restrooms with only a toilet marking are intended for women and restrooms with toilet/urinal markings are intended for men. But that would inevitably lead users to designate restrooms according to gender rather than function — something that the students in the article are lobbying against.
Either way, the proposals they are making are completely illogical.
WAYNE T. SCHAMS
Pingtung
Cleaning up Taichung
In an effort to reduce harmful emissions in our city, Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強) is offering free bus services in an attempt to lower the number of vehicles polluting our streets, as well as encouraging use of public transport.
While I applaud his efforts, is this really the most effective measure he can come up with?
Taiwanese love convenience, and until Taichung has an efficient public transport system, I feel the majority of people will continue to rely on other ways of getting from A to B.
If Hu really wants to reduce pollution levels in Taichung, there are more effective ways of doing so.
First, Taichung needs a police force that does its job. Day after day I see policemen driving past homemade farm vehicles that pump out more blue than a local KMT rally.
The same goes for hundreds, if not thousands, of old scooters that emit a steady stream of blue smoke. It’s these same mass polluting vehicles that usually pay no road tax, gas tax or insurance fees.
Why do I never see one of these polluting vehicles being stopped by police? Why aren’t law-abiding citizens who pay their fees raising a stink about this? The money collected in the form of fines from these illegal and polluting vehicles alone would be enough to run a serious anti-pollution campaign and create awareness of the problem.
Another way Taichung can seriously reduce pollution is to start an anti-pollution task force.
I live in Situn District (西屯), and while walking during the late evenings I can regularly smell burning plastic and rubber. As soon as it’s dark, people burn their garbage and send tonnes of harmful smoke into the air. Taichung is in a basin, and these pollutants stay with us until we have a strong wind to flush the area.
With an anti-pollution task force and fines that actually dent a pocketbook, people will see that Hu is serious about reducing pollution and cleaning up our city.
The fines can also pay for the operations and wages of the task force, therefore ensuring money will not be taken from other sectors.
When rules are not enforced, changes will not be made. Until the Taichung City Government becomes responsible and enforces the law, it can not expect its citizens to be responsible for their actions.
The local government needs to lead by example, and as long as it continues to turn a blind eye, so will the people of Taichung.
Again, I applaud Hu’s efforts to clean up our city, but let’s make sure he’s doing it effectively, and creating jobs while he does so.
NAME WITHHELD
Taichung
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS