‘Status quo’ no longer viable
Huang Chi-yao’s (黃啟堯) insightful piece (“Treaty of Taipei had no claim to sovereignty,” May 2, page 8) exposes the fallacy of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) position over the previous week.
Attaining observer status in the World Health Assembly as “Chinese Taipei,” and not the “Republic of China,” shows once and for all that “one China, two interpretations” is a collective delusion of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and counts for nothing in the international arena: The People’s Republic is the only China.
While “Chinese Taipei” may not offend anyone, it is deliberately ambiguous at a time when clarity is needed, such as what does the word “Chinese” refer to?
It’s not at all helpful that Taiwan could only gain observer status on the WHA merely as a goodwill gesture by Beijing. It meekly accepts in principle where the real power lies, undermining the sovereignty exercised by the Republic of China over Taiwan.
This sovereignty is only further undermined by the signing of economic and trade agreements with the People’s Republic of China — nowhere in the world are such important agreements signed between two governments where one government fundamentally denies the other’s legitimacy. Clarification on what Ma means by “normalization” would therefore be welcome.
Crucially, however, in accepting Beijing’s terms in these matters, the “status quo” — the basis for the US Taiwan Relations Act, even if supported by just 27 percent of Taiwanese, according to a recent poll — appears no longer to be an option. The implication of Huang Chi-yao’s insights would appear to necessitate Taiwanese independence from the Republic of China.
PAUL DEACON
Kuishan, Taoyuan County
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
RSS