‘Status quo’ no longer viable
Huang Chi-yao’s (黃啟堯) insightful piece (“Treaty of Taipei had no claim to sovereignty,” May 2, page 8) exposes the fallacy of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) position over the previous week.
Attaining observer status in the World Health Assembly as “Chinese Taipei,” and not the “Republic of China,” shows once and for all that “one China, two interpretations” is a collective delusion of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and counts for nothing in the international arena: The People’s Republic is the only China.
While “Chinese Taipei” may not offend anyone, it is deliberately ambiguous at a time when clarity is needed, such as what does the word “Chinese” refer to?
It’s not at all helpful that Taiwan could only gain observer status on the WHA merely as a goodwill gesture by Beijing. It meekly accepts in principle where the real power lies, undermining the sovereignty exercised by the Republic of China over Taiwan.
This sovereignty is only further undermined by the signing of economic and trade agreements with the People’s Republic of China — nowhere in the world are such important agreements signed between two governments where one government fundamentally denies the other’s legitimacy. Clarification on what Ma means by “normalization” would therefore be welcome.
Crucially, however, in accepting Beijing’s terms in these matters, the “status quo” — the basis for the US Taiwan Relations Act, even if supported by just 27 percent of Taiwanese, according to a recent poll — appears no longer to be an option. The implication of Huang Chi-yao’s insights would appear to necessitate Taiwanese independence from the Republic of China.
PAUL DEACON
Kuishan, Taoyuan County
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS