After an agreement was reached at the latest round of talks between the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) to open Taiwan to Chinese investment, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said the government planned to allow Chinese investment in 98 categories, including air and sea ports, infrastructure, manufacturing and the service sector. The Financial Supervisory Commission said Chinese institutional investors could purchase up to 10 percent of stakes in companies listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. The TAIEX stock index has risen 6.47 percent on speculation about potential investment, including China Mobile’s (中國移動) move to invest in Far EasTone (遠傳電信).
The rise in stock prices is heartening, but as the bourse reflects the state of the economy, any ups and downs that stray from the fundamentals won’t last long. Right now, those fundamentals are worse than ever — there is a recession, unemployment is soaring, exports are down and the fiscal deficit is troubling. Last month, the IMF predicted negative 7.5 percent growth for Taiwan this year and zero growth next year.
Before Taiwan’s fundamentals improve, any rebound on the stock market can only be the short-term result of speculation. Even if Chinese companies are eyeing Taiwan’s stock market and China-based Taiwanese businesspeople want to invest at home, this will not be sufficient to turn the economy around. Meanwhile, attributing the rise in the stock market to cross-strait reconciliation could lead to unrealistic expectations and slacken efforts to revive the economy.
Taiwan has no lack of funds, so attracting Chinese capital is not needed, nor will opening up to Chinese investors necessarily be good for Taiwan. Chinese investment will not be purely business — the ultimate goal from Beijing’s perspective is to trap Taiwan. China has enormous foreign currency reserves — more than enough for a spending spree in Taiwan. The purpose may be to obtain key technologies or secure a controlling interest in Taiwanese financial, telecommunications, aeronautics, media, construction and high-tech companies. Once China has a hold on these economic lifelines, Taiwan will find itself in the same position as Hong Kong in the 1990s — shackled by China, with no way out.
Now that the government has thrown open the doors, Chinese investment will pour in. Although the government says there will be limits on this investment, past experience shows that such constraints have limited effect.
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) instituted a policy of “go slow and be patient,” and his successor, Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), called for “effective management and active opening.” Lee and Chen’s policies were both meant to keep out Chinese capital, but it arrived nonetheless, disguised as foreign or Hong Kong capital or investment by China-based Taiwanese businesses. Now Ma has opened Pandora’s box.
In the short term, it has boosted stock prices, but as time goes by there will be negative consequences. There will be friction and competition between the two sides and there will be mergers. Rather than rejoicing, the public should ask where Ma’s policies will take Taiwan in the long term.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective