This just in: We're Balinese
Dear Johnny,
According to Mr. Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), the 1952 Treaty of Taipei affirmed the transfer of Taiwan's sovereignty from Japan to the Republic of China (ROC).
“While the 1952 treaty does not specify the legal successor government [of Taiwan], it was clear between the lines,” Ma said.
“Japan would not have signed the accord with the ROC if it did not intend to concede the territories to the ROC,” he said.
First, what's between the lines is clear to the eyes of the beholder.
But few of us would buy a used car on that basis, let alone bargain over the future of an entire nation.
I am of the opinion that the treaty in fact cedes Taiwan to Bali and as a result we can all go on vacation there, without a visa and also on a domestic-fare basis.
To those who are inclined to observe that Mr Ma has engaged in Hollywood-style suspension of disbelief, I remind them that the Queen in Alice in Wonderland has said that, with practice, she was able to believe as many as six impossible things before breakfast.
Like her, let's go on with this fantasy for a while, as it leads us to some marvelous conclusions.
To stake its claim over Taiwan, the People's Republic of China should now declare that they are, and have always been, the ROC.
The only reason comrade Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) did not attend all of those Party congresses in Beijing was that he was on vacation (in Bali, I hasten to add).
In return, the KMT should say that the only reason they were chasing Mao Zedong (毛澤東) across China was to make him their Chairman. That would clear up matters once and for all.
DR ELIZA
Johnny replies: The way things are going, our president is going to wake up one morning, stumble into the bathroom and discover a treaty in his toilet paper bin that proves Alishan and Sun Moon Lake were ceded to the Chinese tourism bureau.
Tax provincialism
Dear Johnny,
Perhaps this is old news that I missed, but I recently came across the English Web site of the National Tax Administration of Southern Taiwan Province. Yes, province.
Even if this is old news, perhaps you would care to shed some light on how this egregious misnomer happened to, and continues to, appear on this Web site.
SCOTT BECK
Taipei
Johnny replies: As you can imagine, I don't spend much of my time trawling through Internet resources relating to taxation, and because the ladies at my local tax office are so lovely and patient despite the regularly provocative behavior they must endure, I am loath to say anything negative about the tax bureacracy.
That, and because I like to keep my meager earnings above suspicion.
So forgive me, Scott, for not ringing up my local tax branch and giving them a lecture on the Confucian tradition of zhengming (正名).
But if you want to get technical, bear in mind that the government has, in whole or part, control of two, possibly three, provinces of “China.”
So what do we do with Kinmen and Matsu if Taiwan is no longer called a province? How about calling those Chinese coast-kissing lumps of rock the Special Autonomous Three Links Zone of the Republic of Taiwan?
Better still, let's upgrade them to a special municipality. It's all the rage these days, don't you know.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS