Contract WORKERS from public sector organizations recently staged a protest to demand that they be included in the Labor Standards Act (勞基法). Newspaper headlines stated that the Council of Labor Affairs and the Ministry of Civil Service tried to pass the buck. Reports on the issue were few, but reflect a big problem. It highlights the fact that there are 26,000 workers in the country whose unclear labor status places them in an awkward position, as well as the imbalanced design of the pension system and its lack of interoperability, both within the public sector and between the public and private sectors. These are issues we cannot afford to overlook as the government places an emphasis on revitalizing the work force to increase competitiveness.
Because contract workers in the public sector have not passed the national civil servant examination, they do not meet the Civil Service Employment Act’s (公務員任用法) narrow definition of civil servant. As a result, they do not enjoy the rights outlined in the Civil Service Protection Act (公務員保障法) or retirement benefits. However, because they may have access to confidential official information, they are still considered civil servants in the broad sense of the term. If they break any regulations, they are subject to the controls on civil servants as outlined in the Act on Discipline of Civil Servants (公務員懲戒法) and the Criminal Code.
They are not eligible for Civil Servant Insurance and therefore must register for labor insurance, but because they serve in the public sector they do not enjoy basic labor rights. During the recent protest, contract workers demanded that the Labor Standards Act apply to them and that their retirement benefits be protected as stipulated by this law. The government can meet these demands, but implementing thorough reform might involve a complete overhaul of the pension system.
The current pension system consists of many similar and parallel measures. In the public sector, the Civil Servant Retirement Act (公務人員退休法) applies to civil servants, the Labor Standards Act applies to laborers and drivers, while contract workers are not covered by any legislation. There is also a clear difference between politically appointed officials and bureaucrats, although both are civil servants. Teachers from public schools and private schools also have different pension systems. Elected local government officials are covered by the Civil Service Survivor Relief Act (公務人員撫卹法) and the Act Governing the Retirement and Consolation Payment to Political Appointees (政務人員退職撫卹條例), while no such legislation applies to legislators. There are countless examples of such parallel legislation, as well as many problems with linkages between the public and private sector, and the labor force in general.
The standard answer given to these issues by the Ministry of Civil Service is that contract workers have a severance savings fund to which the government and the contract worker pay a certain amount each month to be managed by the employer. In the future, if the legislature passes a contract worker act, public contract workers transferring to the private sector will be able to transfer their seniority, the money in the severance fund and accumulated benefits to the Labor Pension Fund, and they will then be able to apply for retirement in accordance with labor pension regulations and receive a regular labor pension.
This, however, is where the problem lies. A contract worker who in the future takes a job covered by the Labor Standards Law can apply their accumulated seniority and savings funds when applying for retirement, but what happens if the same person becomes a civil servant or if a worker covered by the Labor Standards Law becomes a contract worker? Transferable benefits have long been in use overseas and are coming into use in Taiwan. Why can’t we make a comprehensive plan for this?
The Examination Yuan is reviewing the lifelong employment system and will implement a strict retirement mechanism. More civil servants will take other positions or move to the private sector. Human concerns and the increasing mobility of the nation’s labor force make transferable benefits necessary and such benefits would solve many problems.
Ideally, each citizen should have an account that enables them to transfer their retirement benefits, regardless of whether they serve in the public or private sector. These accounts should be managed by government organizations or organizations entrusted by the government. Seniority, the funds in the account and accumulated benefits should be transferable between jobs until workers can enjoy their accumulated retirement benefits. Such systems exist in welfare states, so why hasn’t Taiwan done it?
At least in public institutions, the Ministry of Civil Service, the Council of Labor Affairs, the Central Personnel Administration and the Ministry of the Interior must be responsible for integration planning. It is not just contract workers that suffer from unclear work status. Politically appointed officials transferring from public schools can continue to make payments into their savings fund, while those transferring from private schools cannot; and their severance cannot even compare to the benefits enjoyed by temporary staff. Bureaucrats who transfer to government-accredited organizations associated with China affairs have their seniority discontinued and will lose their retirement benefits if they do not return to their original posts. Public school teachers who become legislators who do not return to teaching or who exceed the retirement age will also lose their job status.
On the other hand, care providers in child care centers set up for farmers in the busy season are not civil servants and their jobs are temporary in nature. However, legal amendments now allow them to include their time at such child care centers in the calculation of seniority for retirement for public kindergarten teachers.
The fact that these absurd cases exist clearly proves the necessity for planning a well-rounded system for transferable retirement benefits in Taiwan.
Tsai Bih-hwang is a member of the Examination Yuan.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
RSS