The third round of talks between the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) concluded in Nanjing, China, yesterday. SEF Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) and ARATS Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) signed three agreements on judicial matters and fighting crime, financial cooperation and scheduled passenger flights across the Taiwan Strait. While the government celebrates the deals, however, it should be borne in mind that the agreements reached at the previous two rounds of talks have not produced the promised benefits.
During the first two rounds of cross-strait talks in Beijing and Taipei last year, the delegates signed six agreements on charter flights, opening Taiwan to Chinese tourists, air and sea freight, food safety and postal services. The government claims that these agreements have brought economic and other benefits, but in its rush to start cross-strait flights, it limited its negotiating power and may have damaged the nation’s sovereignty. Even then, Chinese visitors to Taiwan did not meet the government’s targets until Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) personally called for more people to visit Taiwan.
The government said agreements signed at the second SEF-ARATS meeting in November to expand air and sea links would save time and cut costs in cross-strait trade and promote Taiwan’s position in the Asia-Pacific region. Yet Taiwan gained only what had already been agreed upon under the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration. In exchange, the government made concessions on national sovereignty by accepting the so-called “1992 consensus” and saying that China is divided into “Taiwan and mainland areas.”
The outline for the agreements reached at this third meeting was decided some time ago, but before departing for Nanjing, the government added new goals, including a target increase in the number of cross-strait flights. It forecast benefits of financial cooperation for Taiwan’s economy and promised that an agreement on fighting crime would make it easier to repatriate fugitives wanted for major economic crimes.
Opposition politicians do not share the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) optimism. They have criticized the SEF for not promoting and defending Taiwan’s interests. For example, there has been no progress on allowing Taiwanese airlines to extend cross-strait flights to new destinations. DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) compared the role of Taiwanese carriers under such conditions to feeder bus routes serving the high-speed rail service. The Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU), for its part, criticized the government for failing to appraise the impact of cross-strait market deregulation on workers and businesses. The TSU believes Taiwanese will suffer before they see any benefit.
The talks in Nanjing coincided with celebrations of the 60th anniversary of the “liberation of Nanjing,” referring to the Communist Party’s ouster of the KMT from its seat of government in 1949. This context put Taiwan’s negotiators at a disadvantage in terms of morale.
The agreements signed last November in Taipei took effect without discussion or approval by the legislature, in violation of the principle of democracy and without any checks and balances. The latest agreements have even greater implications for Taiwan’s future, yet the KMT government has failed to communicate with opposition parties and the public before the negotiations. If it does not give legislators a chance to review the latest agreements, it will fuel concerns of a return to one-party rule.
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It