Local memory chipmakers took a drubbing on Friday after speculation that the government’s semiconductor czar for the struggling dynamic random access memory (DRAM) industry had offered to resign.
While both John Hsuan (宣明智), designated chief of Taiwan Memory Co (TMC), and Minister of Economic Affairs Yiin Chii-ming (尹啟銘) immediately denied the rumors, the incident highlights the fact that after only seven weeks on the job Hsuan feels frustrated by skepticism of TMC’s business model and its role in restructuring the local DRAM industry.
Rumors that Hsuan would quit began circulating as the legislature’s Economics Committee passed a motion on April 15 asking the Ministry of Economic Affairs to report on its policy relating to the DRAM industry and TMC’s business plan.
Lawmakers have criticized TMC, saying the company was originally to play a supportive role in the industry, but because it had focused on restructuring rather than bailing out cash-strapped chipmakers, they believed the company would become a potential competitor to existing companies.
The cold shoulder that leading local DRAM players such as Powerchip Semiconductor Corp and Nanya Technology Corp have presented to TMC therefore comes as a surprise to no one.
On Friday, a report from the legislature’s budget center regarding the DRAM rescue plan further fortified lawmakers’ suspicions about TMC.
The report said the government should discontinue plans to set up the company. It pictured TMC as a “vulture company” that would prey on weaker players during downturns. It also criticized Hsuan’s plan to make TMC a fabless design house that outsources manufacturing to local DRAM makers, saying it would not solve the current oversupply problem or help consolidate the ailing DRAM sector, but instead intensify the already fierce competition in the sector.
The report also suggested TMC would not qualify to obtain financing from the Cabinet’s National Development Fund as stipulated by the Act for Upgrading Industries (促進產業升級條例), because it would not help upgrade the local DRAM sector or change its industry structure. If the government were to invest in TMC as planned, the report said the money would first need to be approved by lawmakers.
Should Hsuan quit the job and the government scrap TMC, there would be no loss in government funds. The government would also save taxpayer money because major DRAM companies have started to see chip prices rebound from record lows following production cuts.
With TMC’s plans to not merge local players, existing companies are coming up with their own rescue plans by either securing new funds, extending bank loans or strengthening cooperation with foreign technology partners.
What really affected the DRAM industry is that the government missed the opportunity to consolidate the troubled industry in the fourth quarter of last year, when companies’ financial problems began appearing. If TMC failed to work as promised, will the government lose another opportunity to enhance competitiveness in the local sector while South Korean rivals Samsung Electronics Co and Hynix Semiconductor Inc benefit from Taiwan’s troubles?
The signs of Hsuan’s frustration indicate that the government’s effort to narrow the gap between Taiwanese DRAM companies and their competitors seems to have hit a bump in the road.
Speculation over his resignation also suggests that the government’s rescue plans have so far resulted in little more than a series of talks, including TMC’s choosing of Japan’s Elpida Memory Inc as its technology partner on April 1, which both sides have yet to formally agree on.
The government and TMC must either move quickly or back off and allow time to tell whether the industry’s development is on the right track.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,