Taiwan at dusk
Your editorial (“The DPP is its own enemy,” April 3, page 8), reminds me of the Chinese saying “the setting sun is limitlessly good, but close to dusk” (夕陽無限好只是近黃昏), and the Taiwanese song Homeland at Dusk (黃昏的故鄉), in regard to former presidential office secretary-general Mark Chen’s (陳唐山) decision to run for Tainan County commissioner against another DPP [Democratic Pregressive Party] candidate and the KMT [Chinese Nationalist Party] candidate.
The saying means that the scene of a sunset is beautiful but heralds an ending, and the song is so moving that it makes many Taiwanese well up with tears when they sing it.
Chen, at age 74, is still popular in Tainan County because of his excellent service there for two terms, which earned him the top rating in performance among all commissioners and mayors in Taiwan.
He served at different official capacities during the DPP era. In spite of his popularity, there is no need for him to run again for the same office, especially against a younger DPP candidate.
History has shown that two candidates from the same party are usually defeated by a candidate from another party. Chen is pivotal in the unity or disunity of the DPP, with all members depending on his decision to withdraw from the race or not.
His decision can also affect the future of Taiwan. If he withdraws from the race, many voters in Tainan County may be disappointed initially but they will eventually appreciate his actions for cultivating younger blood in the DPP.
The young blood should be encouraged to run for public office — win or lose.
If Chen’s name (meaning Old China) were used as a riddle, the logical answer to this riddle would be “New Taiwan.”
Let’s hope that Chen will make a wise decision so that Taiwan at dusk will become Taiwan at dawn.
CHARLES HONG
Columbus, Ohio
A Chinese diplomat’s violent threat against Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi following her remarks on defending Taiwan marks a dangerous escalation in East Asian tensions, revealing Beijing’s growing intolerance for dissent and the fragility of regional diplomacy. Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday posted a chilling message on X: “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off,” in reference to Takaichi’s remark to Japanese lawmakers that an attack on Taiwan could threaten Japan’s survival. The post, which was later deleted, was not an isolated outburst. Xue has also amplified other incendiary messages, including one suggesting
Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday last week shared a news article on social media about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan, adding that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The previous day in the Japanese House of Representatives, Takaichi said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival,” a reference to a legal legal term introduced in 2015 that allows the prime minister to deploy the Japan Self-Defense Forces. The violent nature of Xue’s comments is notable in that it came from a diplomat,
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
RSS