Three weeks ago, with the assistance of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), independent candidate Kang Shih-ju (康世儒) defeated Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate Chen Luan-ying (陳鑾英) in the legislative by-election in Miaoli County.
However, KMT candidate Chiang Nai-hsin (蔣乃辛) was still able to secure the legislative seat in the by-election in Taipei City’s Da-an District on March 28 by defeating DPP candidate Chou Po-ya (周柏雅), independent candidate Yao Li-ming (姚立明), who was endorsed by the New Party and the Home Party, and four other candidates. The fact that the KMT captured less than 50 percent of the vote, however, could be seen as a vote of no confidence in President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the KMT.
The reason Chiang won the by-election was not that voters supported the government’s performance but because the KMT successfully engineered “strategic voting.” Thus, the KMT should not be too pleased as it only secured its core support at best. More important, we should focus on what impact the results of these two legislative by-elections will have on the political status of the KMT leadership, elite and power structure, as well as the next election.
First of all, Ma’s move to stump for Chiang was an attempt to manipulate strategic voting in the pan-blue camp to increase the KMT’s chances of winning the election. Although Chiang was elected, the drop in votes indicates that Ma’s political clout is rapidly waning and that his ability to swing votes has diminished. On the contrary, those who used to support the KMT also wanted to use the by-elections to warn the Ma administration, which has repeatedly failed to carry out Ma’s campaign promises.
Since the DPP lost the legislative by-election and only managed to maintain its core pan-green supporter base, DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) will probably not gain the full support of the pan-green camp even if she retains her post. This could level the status between her and DPP bigwigs such as Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) and Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) and create challenges to her authority within the party. But does Tsai have the ability or strategies to increase the pan-green vote? In particular, how will she clear the shadow of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) hanging over the party and lead it to a comeback? These are questions Tsai must consider.
Secondly, the KMT could not afford to lose the Da-an by-election if it wanted to avoid an internal clash. Luckily for the KMT, it secured the seat in this traditional pan-blue stronghold and KMT Chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) thus kept his throne. Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) is an indirect beneficiary of the election win because for the time being he can avoid taking political responsibility for the Cabinet’s performance. However, the generational change in the KMT may hit a roadblock that will revive the impression that the KMT is a gerontocracy.
Finally, the third force of smaller parties indeed has had little influence on the current political scene, especially under the single member district plurality system, as can be seen from the number of votes Yao and Green Party candidate Calvin Wen (溫炳原) received in the by-election. In light of this, the future development of the DPP will partly hinge on how it integrates with the third force to counteract the dominance of the KMT. This has become a task for both the DPP and the third force.
The two by-elections have prompted the DPP to start pondering what benefit it can gain in the year-end county commissioner elections from a split in the pan-blue camp. The KMT leadership’s top priorities will be preventing a split among pan-blue supporters and directing effective strategic voting. The Taoyuan County commissioner election is a good example of what could happen. If John Wu (吳志揚), the son of Wu Poh-hsiung, were to represent the KMT in the election, the DPP would likely attempt to produce a situation similar to the legislative by-elections in Miaoli County by switching its support to another potential KMT candidate who may quit the party to run.
All in all, the two legislative by-elections have not only had implications for the KMT leadership, its power structure and election strategy, but could also be seen as a vote of no confidence in the government.
Chen Chao-chien is an assistant professor of public affairs at Ming Chuan University.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS