Concluding their summit in London last week, leaders of the G20 member states pledged to provide US$5 trillion in fiscal resources to counter the global economic crisis between now and the end of next year. They also promised to take action to eliminate tax havens and to curb excessive pay and compensation for company executives. They further pledged to provide US$1.1 trillion through the IMF and other global financial institutions to help countries with deeply troubled economies to weather the storm.
It is too early to say whether the measures will get the world out of the current economic crisis. Still, national leaders have expressed their sincere determination to overcome differences and take joint action. Hopefully this will boost lending, investment and consumer confidence. The summit statement is an important milestone on the road that may lead out of this recession. What remains to be seen is whether the actual steps taken by countries around the world can deliver on the pledges.
The G20 agreed to a US$1.1 trillion program of support to restore credit, growth and jobs in the world economy, including US$500 billion in concessional finance, a new allocation of US$250 billion for IMF special drawing rights (SDR) and US$250 billion in support of trade finance. How these astronomical sums will be amassed is not entirely clear, especially now that the financial crisis has swept across the world.
Taiwan is a significant economy, with foreign currency reserves of more than US$300 billion, fourth in the world behind China, Japan and Russia. Although Taiwan has felt the impact of the international financial storm, its finances remain fairly healthy when compared with many other countries. Taiwan is, therefore, in a position to provide financial assistance to other countries.
Some foreign commentators have complained that Taiwan, with its strong economy, should have been invited to join the G20. Taiwan did not take part in the summit and international actors would soon ask Taiwan to take a role in international efforts to counter the financial crisis or ask it to contribute funds to the IMF.
However, Taiwan’s economy is export-oriented and as such, it is closely linked to the international economy. That means that helping revive the global economy is in Taiwan’s own interest as much as it is in the interest of the rest of the world.
Because Taiwan’s particular international status precludes participation in many international organizations, the government should consider ways of taking part before the question arises.
The worst idea would be for Taiwan to simply provide funds through China, which would only reinforce the impression that Taiwan is part of China. The result would be a substantial loss to Taiwan. The government must avoid this scenario at all costs.
A better option would be for Taiwan to provide funds through the US. Although this might look peculiar from a diplomatic perspective, it would build mutual trust and strengthen Taiwan’s relationship with Washington.
A final option, though, is the Asian Development Bank (ADB), which is one of the few international organizations of which Taiwan is a member. The ADB also has a close working relationship with the IMF. Channeling aid through the ADB would allow Taiwan to exercise its rights as an independent member of the bank, reducing diplomatic entanglements. It would also strengthen Taiwan’s position within the ADB and demonstrate its commitment to the global effort. This is the best option for Taiwan to participate in international efforts to counter the financial crisis.
The US Department of Defense recently released this year’s “Report on Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China.” This annual report provides a comprehensive overview of China’s military capabilities, strategic objectives and evolving global ambitions. Taiwan features prominently in this year’s report, as capturing the nation remains central to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) vision of the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation,” a goal he has set for 2049. The report underscores Taiwan’s critical role in China’s long-term strategy, highlighting its significance as a geopolitical flashpoint and a key target in China’s quest to assert dominance
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of