A man called horse
The surname of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) means “horse.”
A few months into his tenure, it has become increasingly justifiable to compare this horse of undetermined pedigree to that historical quadruped of ill repute: the Trojan horse.
The breed uncertainty here can be attributed to the lingering controversy surrounding the Hong Kong-born, Taiwanese president’s US green card and naturalization status.
The Trojans in Homer’s Odyssey had an advantage Taiwanese do not of at least knowing the origin of their horse. They knew those pouring out from the wooden horse were Greek soldiers, while Taiwanese have a hard time recognizing Ma’s intention.
This is despite the fact that the Ma administration is busying itself with whittling away at the nation’s sovereignty.
Ma and company often operate in stretched gray areas of the Constitution, while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) controlled legislature not only forsakes its role as the government watchdog but regularly turns a blind eye to Ma’s shenanigans. As a result, Ma’s representatives routinely discuss cross-strait affairs with Beijing officials behind closed doors and sign memorandums sans legislative oversight, much less subject to public scrutiny.
But matters will soon come to a head, so to speak, thanks to subjects of momentous consequences that loom on the horizon.
A test balloon has been floated by both Beijing and Ma administration regarding the prospect of inking a Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA) between China and Taiwan. Up to this point, similar documents with the distinctive “one nation, twosystems” implication have only been signed between Beijing and its territories, Macau and Hong Kong.
Given that both China and Taiwan are members of the WTO, the content of the CEPA would have to be disclosed to the global trade body even if it is currently undemocratically wrapped in a blanket of silence.
That means the Taiwanese public would eventually know, albeit belatedly, the extent of the duplicity.
Ma had promised during his campaign for presidency that Taiwan’s future would be determined by the 23 million Taiwanese. His presidential mandate does not include conduct that would run counter to that commitment to democracy.
A similar situation arises from the seemingly imminent importation of two giant pandas as China’s “gift” to Taiwan.
The treaty of the UN’s Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) of Wild Fauna and Flora bears signatures from 173 countries, including China. It stipulates stringent restrictions on moving pandas, listed under Appendix I of CITES, from their natural habitats in China to zoos in foreign countries: Only loans with hefty fees — but no trade — is permitted.
Beijing has dangled that same immensely popular “gift” in front of Taiwanese before, but the former Democratic Progressive Party government turned down the offer on the grounds that it is difficult to provide a healthy environment for the pandas. The real reason, however, was its rejection of Beijing’s ruse to make Taiwan appear as a region of China.
Beijing and Ma’s perfidious exploitation of a noble cause — one aimed at protecting endangered animals — to advance their unification agenda should remind Taiwanese of the precarious state of their own nation.
Only through a great, concerted and timely effort can Taiwanese prevent their democracy from faring worse than the endangered species listed in CITES. No less is needed to keep Taiwanese sovereignty from being traded away from its native abode, a fate forbidden to befall species placed on Appendix I that include giant pandas.
Huang Jei-hsuan
Los Angeles, California
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS