For Barry McKernan and Saavik Ford, academics who live with their baby son in New York, sitting down to the television news is a nightly ritual, as it has been for generations of families.
But there the tradition ends. Instead of watching heavyweight presenters dispense news from on high, the couple switch to The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, known for delivering stories with lacerating humor and an inbuilt bullshit detector. They know Stewart will part politicians from their reputations with laser-like precision, while simultaneously rubbing the media’s nose in its own deference. And, more importantly, they trust him.
“The Daily Show is probably more reliable for news than anything on TV except PBS [Public Broadcasting Service],” said McKernan, 36, who teaches astronomy at the Borough of Manhattan Community College. “It stands apart from everything else because it unspins the news. It frankly points out how ridiculous the 24-hour news networks are — mostly gassing away by unqualified ‘experts’ filling the hours.”
McKernan and Ford — young, liberal, politically engaged — are typical of a section of the US that has grown skeptical of what they see as mainstream TV’s bland, knee-jerk journalism. For them only one man is asking the right questions, and that is a 45-year-old comedian called Jon Stewart. Like a court jester, he segues into truths that solemn courtiers cannot or dare not, announcing to the startled throng that the emperor has no clothes.
“‘The mainstream news media appear to me to be too lazy to do their jobs as well as a comedian,” Ford, 30, said.
The Daily Show is satire with substance, a spoof news program in which Stewart mercilessly punctures the headlines and skewers the powerful with cleverly edited film clips, sharp one-liners and bemused expressions. It features interviews — guests have included Victoria Beckham, former US president Bill Clinton, Tom Cruise and former Pakistani president Pervez Musharraf — and parodic news items from a team of roving reporters.
Ridiculous stories delivered with a straight face, in the style of the fake newspaper The Onion, are combined with the bracing iconoclasticism of Michael Moore minus earnestness or ego. Foreign viewers can catch it via the Comedy Central Web site.
Broadcast on cable channel Comedy Central, it has prospered in the Bush years with steadily growing viewing figures — still below 2 million but, like the New York Times (circulation 1.1 million), punching above its weight with opinion formers.
Its bite-sized chunks of laugh-out-loud smartness are also perfectly geared for Internet virals and the so-called “YouTube generation.”
A blogger called Matt Tobey may have only got slightly carried away last week when he wrote: “I wasn’t alive to see Michelangelo paint the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. I wasn’t born yet when the Beatles toured. And I probably won’t ever get out to see that Japanese dude eat all them hotdogs. But goddamn, seeing Jon Stewart at his absolute best running circles around cable news douchebags is almost as good.”
This year’s presidential election has marked Stewart’s coming of age as a cultural and political force in the US. Whereas his debut as Oscars host in 2006 saw some jokes fall flat, he returned this year in triumph with timely political gags. Appearing on The Daily Show — described by Newsweek magazine as “the coolest pit stop on television” — is now a gamble that no would-be president can afford to duck if they want to parade their “human side” and ability to laugh at themselves
Senator John McCain, the Republican presidential candidate, has been on more than a dozen times over the years. Senator Barack Obama, his Democratic rival, used The Daily Show for his last TV appearance before the primary election in Pennsylvania. Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton — “the first viable presidential candidate with a working uterus” — appeared on the eve of the crucial primaries in Texas and Ohio. At the Democratic national convention, Daily Show reporters found it hard to work as they were mobbed by so many fans.
It is a delicious paradox that people’s search for truth has led them to fake news. Under the headline “Is Jon Stewart the Most Trusted Man in America?,” the New York Times opined recently: “The Daily Show resonates not only because it is wickedly funny but also because its keen sense of the absurd is perfectly attuned to an era in which cognitive dissonance has become a national epidemic. Indeed, Stewart’s frequent exclamation ‘Are you insane?!’ seems a fitting refrain for a post-M*A*S*H, post-Catch-22 reality, where the surreal and outrageous have become commonplace — an era kicked off by the 2000 election standoff in Florida, rocked by 9/11 and haunted by the fallout of a costly war waged on the premise of weapons of mass destruction that did not exist.”
Showing politicians condemn themselves out of their own mouths is a classic Stewart maneuver. In one sequence, The Daily Show spliced excerpts from McCain’s acceptance speech at the Republican convention with one by US President George W. Bush before he became president. The word-for-word similarities were uncanny, promising change in Washington, a pro-life culture and the rest. It was a masterpiece of editing that required no narrative to tear down false idols, arguably more effective than anything the Democrats have thrown at McCain in recent weeks. It makes Obama’s argument that McCain represents a third term of Bush more eloquently than the candidate himself has so far managed.
Stewart’s admirers in the political and media classes are legion. David Remnick, editor of The New Yorker magazine, said: “He is our most astute — and, obviously, most hilarious — press watchdog and overall political bullshit monitor. His most effective move is to cull through the tapes of all the countless banalities, hypocritical contradictions and attempted snow-jobs executed in boundless profusion on our airwaves and on political podiums. He just puts them on the air and you watch with slack-jawed amazement.”
“Stewart is all the things the best stand-up comics are —- quick, verbally deft — but he is also possessed of a political and moral sense. There are days when I think he is the only one keeping a sane head,” Remnick said.
The Daily Show also satirizes US media with its cliches, hang-ups and petty obsessions. For those who accuse Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News of being a partisan Republican mouthpiece, there seemed to be no antidote until The Daily Show came along. It also strikes a chord with those who feel the 24-hour news channels hype every gaffe into a hurricane and despair of US newspapers as their circulations fall and they lay off staff.
The lack of aggression in challenging the official intelligence used to justify the Iraq war, and the timidity around revelations of former senator John Edwards’s extramarital affair are just two examples of a perceived cancer eating into US journalism.
Step forward Stewart, filling the void not with new facts — he does not claim to be an investigative reporter — but forensic editing and satirical snap. Iraq was quickly branded “Mess O’Potamia.” While mainstream TV news endlessly repeated the Pentagon’s description of “the coalition of the willing” backing US forces, Stewart was quick to dub them the “coalition of the piddling” and point out that allies such as Morocco were sending not troops but 2,000 monkeys to set off landmines. Other media were forced to play catch-up when the show highlighted the links between Halliburton, of which Vice President Dick Cheney was chief executive, and government wartime contracts worth millions.
Gavin Esler, the BBC current affairs presenter and former chief North America correspondent, describes Stewart as “hugely influential” in the US.
“I think his success tells you a great deal about the dire state of some American network television journalism. It is often parochial, sentimental and focused on a diet of crime stories, supposedly ‘human interest’ stories and medical ‘breakthroughs.’ It is no coincidence that the biggest cheer [Alaskan Governor] Sarah Palin received in her Republican convention speech was when she attacked the mainstream media,” he said.
“Stewart is highly intelligent, perceptive and persistent as an interviewer but also funny. He allows his guests to be human and is not sycophantic. The best interviews I have seen this year with Obama, Hillary Clinton and McCain have all been by Stewart. It’s hardly surprising they appear on his shows — they get to demonstrate their own sense of humor, which is very appealing to voters,” Esler said.
Many on the right believe the show is too liberal, in a country where that can be something of a dirty word. Stewart has admitted he is looking forward to the end of the Bush administration “as a comedian, as a person, as a citizen, as a mammal.”
But The Daily Show goes beyond party politics. When political debate in the most powerful country on Earth boils down to the semantics of “putting lipstick on a pig,” its stiffest challenge is to keep fake news more absurd than the real thing.
Keep succeeding, and Jon Stewart might even swing the election.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the