A few days ago, Citizen Congress Watch held its first legislator evaluation conference, attracting delegates from academia, social groups and the media . Ahead of the conference, there was an explanatory meeting and delegates were given many documents to read. At the conference itself, they compared the overall performance of the legislature’s eight standing committees and the behavior of individual legislators. Discussion was animated but participants adhered strictly to the agenda, with no political manipulation and no predetermined standpoints.
The participants felt the conference had been a good example of deliberative democracy, and that they had done their duty as citizens by keeping an eye on our elected representatives.
However, once the results of the evaluation were announced, some lawmakers who scored poorly reacted strongly, vilifying Citizen Congress Watch and the conference delegates. This reaction was not unexpected. One purpose for the conference was for legislators to learn to deal with public oversight.
If lawmakers can’t accept oversight, do they think it would be alright for government officials to refuse to be scrutinized by the legislature? The legislature would become a more civilized place if lawmakers adjusted their attitude.
It took three months to organize the conference, with academics and experts working out the evaluation criteria, and dozens of volunteers who worked day and night to collect and compile background data. It took thousands of hours of work to prepare for the conference.
Unfortunately the conference workers were so busy that, in working out basic scores for the legislators, they omitted the “legislative reform pledge” signed and faxed in at the last moment by Legislator Chiu Yi (邱毅), which affected his score. As soon as the error was discovered, Citizen Congress Watch issued an apology and accepted full responsibility. It also announced that in future it would triple check facts before making any announcement.
Politicians, however, should demand of themselves the same willingness to admit and learn from mistakes, instead of stubbornly denying any wrongdoing.
The experience of this conference has shown that the assessment criteria drawn up by Citizen Congress Watch were more suitable for long-term monitoring, since it is not easy to generate fair scores based on short-term performance. We will need to adjust our criteria and methods so that the people being assessed will be more willing to accept the results.
In Taiwan’s political climate, any public activity that touches on politics runs the risk of being classified as either “blue” or “green,” with nothing in between, instead of being judged objectively. Unless things change, rational discussion in the public domain will remain out of reach.
While humbly accepting the criticisms that have been laid against us, we at Citizen Congress Watch hope our critics will not resort to unfair labeling of the legislature, because without such monitoring the “legislative monster” will become more lawless, and the public the main victims.
Ku Chung-hwa is chairman of Citizen Congress Watch
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS