Missing the point?
Both Vincent Lalonde and Adam Supernant (Letters, May 26, page 8) raise some valid points, but they both seem to be missing the thrust of the argument put forward by J. Michael Cole (“Why are we sending aid to China?”, May 23, page 8).
What China needed in the immediate aftermath of the disaster was boots on the ground contributing to the search and rescue effort, emergency supplies and equipment, logistical support and medical expertise. Not cold hard cash. China has massive foreign currency reserves on which to draw that could be distributed equitably if, and as, required.
One final point. If money was all that was needed in the wake of a disaster, and indeed, if money somehow equated to one’s level of compassion and sympathy, why didn’t Taiwan’s government pledge an equal amount to the survivors of the Myanmar disaster?
While it’s unfair to compare one person’s suffering with another, the Burmese, in my opinion, are in an even less enviable position than the Chinese.
Who’s playing politics now and why are the Burmese seemingly worth less?
Karl Haby
Taipei
Be wary of China
As a foreigner who has been a long-time resident of Taiwan, to say that I feel trepidation at the growing ties between the new KMT government and China is an understatement.
The stated goals of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) for his visit to China — peace, expanded business ties and increased tourism — sound benign and modest enough. No one is breathing a word about unification. But anytime one deals with Beijing, looking deeper and farther is essential.
China’s leaders, despite their bluster about invasion and occasional missile practice in the Taiwan Strait, are nothing if not patient. With, as they believe, the “current of history” on their side, they prefer a gradualist approach; secure in their positions, their plans are spun out over decades, not the four-year cycles of Taiwanese or US politics.
Consider Tibet. The Chinese have been in power there since 1951, with the Beijing gradually but relentlessly wearing down Tibetan culture and identity under a program of Han Chinese immigration, the crowning achievement of which is the completion of the Bejing-Lhasa railway.
This campaign, described by the Dalai Lama as a program of “cultural genocide,” bore its deadliest fruit during the recent protests and Chinese crackdown, when Beijing justified its actions as necessary to protect Han Chinese from violence at the hands of Tibetans.
Such a claim is reminiscent of Adolf Hitler’s insistence on annexing the Czech Sudetenland to protect the rights of ethnic Germans (or, for that matter, former US president Ronald Reagan’s claim that his invasion of newly-Marxist Grenada was motivated by his concern for the handful of US citizens there).
Imagine for a moment that there is a real, long-term thaw in relations between China and Taiwan, bringing with it greater trade, tourism and perhaps even a large, semi-permanent Chinese population in Taiwan. Imagine then that a Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-style government is once again elected on an independence platform. A Chinese invasion, instead of making Beijing an international pariah, might be then viewed as a regrettable but necessary step to protect the safety and business interests of its people.
It’s an alarming scenario, but not, I think, an alarmist one. Taiwanese would do well to weigh the short-term benefits of an accommodation with China against the long-range consequences. The little bird that picks the crocodile’s teeth eats well — for a while.
Barry Hall
Danshui
Tourists beware
Taiwan as a country is really trying to improve its image and to get more tourists to visit. I don’t think this will ever be very successful when foreigners are usually charged more than Taiwanese for goods and services by many businesses.
What is so sad is that my Taiwanese friends always warn me about this. I am also not the only foreigner who has been done in like this. All foreigners I talk to about this agree with me.
Just recently I went to Tai Mall in Nankan to get a quote about joining the local gym. I was quoted a rate of NT$1,888 per month, while my Taiwanese friend joined for NT$1,250 per month.
When my friends at home ask me what it is like in Taiwan, the first thing I tell them is about this disgusting habit of businesses charging foreigners more. Are businesses really that short sighted? Don’t they realize what they are doing to visitors’ attitude toward Taiwan?
Johan McCarthy
Nankan
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS