Catholic guilt-free
Dear Johnny,
I lived in Taiwan from 1996 to 2004, first in Taipei, then Tainan. Now I live and work in Jerusalem, Israel.
I read the Taipei Times online regularly, and I appreciate your humor ... well, most of it (some dirty jokes are too much).
I confess that I do not have a special preference for the KMT or the DPP but it is refreshing to read your comments.
So don’t worry about critical observations and keep writing.
Fr Michele Ferrero
Johnny replies: Clearly my dirty jokes are just about on the mark if they are offending some of my Catholic readers more than my occasional sniping at the Vatican.
Interesting that you choose to “confess” no preference for either of the two main political parties. I’ve never thought that any foreigner should be expected to support any particular party in this country.
So relax, because I confess that I am not going to make an exception of you.
If I were less diplomatic, however, I would attempt to pluck up the courage to ask you a few questions about your experiences in Taiwan in the confessional.
We all know that the Catholic Church was more disposed to the KMT regime than the Presbyterians.
So did you ever get some aging Taiwan Garrison Command thug approaching you trying to cleanse himself of his catalog of sins committed during the Martial Law era?
I know you can’t talk about these things, so knock once for “yes” and twice for “no.”
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which