After missiles, germs and viruses?
China is once again confronting the threat of an epidemic. This time around, the disease is enterovirus, which as of Monday had infected 4,500 people in China and killed 22, Chinese state media said. Given Beijing’s track record of hiding the magnitude of epidemics, however, it would not be surprising if the government were once again downplaying the seriousness of the situation.
Meanwhile, 64 cases of serious enterovirus infection — with two deaths — have also been reported in Taiwan this year.
While Centers for Disease Control officials have said that the infections in China and Taiwan were caused by genetically distinct subgenogroups and are therefore unconnected, China’s poor record of reporting disease outbreaks has many in Taiwan concerned that it may only be a matter of time before a sneeze in China represents a threat to Taiwanese.
The nightmare of the 2003 SARS epidemic is still vivid in many people’s mind. Because of criminal neglect by the Chinese government, the outbreak of atypical pneumonia, the first case of which was traced back to Guangdong Province in November 2002, was allowed to spread to Hong Kong, Taiwan and as far as Toronto and the east coast of the US before measures were taken to address the problem.
The SARS outbreak claimed 73 lives in Taiwan — the third-highest death toll after China and Hong Kong. As a direct result of Beijing’s relentless blocking of Taiwan’s application for WHO membership or observer status, Taiwan found itself unable to communicate with WHO officials at the height of the crisis. It took two months before the WHO dispatched health experts to deal with the situation in Taiwan.
Unfortunately, this wasn’t the first time the WHO — which trumpets itself as an international health body that puts global health issues first — had ignored calls by a country in the midst of a health emergency.
In 1998, an outbreak of enterovirus in Taiwan resulted in 80 deaths. Again, because Taiwan was not a member of the WHO, the organization did not respond to Taipei’s call for assistance, which instead came from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Subsequent to that incident, it was determined that an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in Kinmen had been caused by sick cattle smuggled from China.
By yielding to Beijing’s pressure and barring Taiwan from membership, the WHO has violated not only Taiwanese’s right to medical service, but also created a blind spot in the global disease prevention network.
Given its geographic proximity to China, Taiwan will always be at risk of catching a Chinese cold.
As there is no way Taiwan can change its geographic location, the WHO’s inclusion of Taiwan in the global health network is the one practical and effective alternative in protecting the health of Taiwanese.
But until members of the WHO come to their senses and stand up to Beijing, Taiwanese will continue to be threatened by Beijing’s disregard for human life.
French firm DCI-DESCO in April won a bid to upgrade Taiwan’s Lafayette frigates, which has strained ties between China and France. In 1991, France sold Taiwan six Lafayette frigates and in 1992 sold it 60 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. To prevent arms sales between the nations, China negotiated an agreement with France and in 1994 in a joint statement, France promised that there would be no future arms sales to Taiwan. From China’s point of view, the DCI-DESCO deal constitutes a breach of the agreement, but the French stance is that it is not selling Taiwan new weapons, but instead providing a
Chung Yuan ChristiaN University is clearly in bed with the People’s Republic of China. This can be the only explanation why the school’s authorities have done their utmost to shield a student, who lodged a complaint against an associate professor, and then used thuggish tactics to compel the teacher to issue two separate apologies to China. The original complaint, filed by an unnamed Chinese student, was for remarks by associate professor Chao Ming-wei (招名威) during a class on the origin of COVID-19. A second complaint was filed by the same student after Chao, during an apology, stated that he was a
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in her inaugural address on May 20 firmly said: “We will not accept the Beijing authorities’ use of ‘one country, two systems’ to downgrade Taiwan and undermine the cross-strait status quo.” The Chinese government was not too happy, and later that day, an opinion piece on the Web site of China’s state broadcaster China Central Television said: “While Tsai’s first inaugural address four years ago was read by Beijing as an ‘unfinished answer sheet,’ the one she presented this time was even more below-par.” Speaking to the China Review News Agency, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies vice president
During my twenty-two years in the US Senate, I became a student of Taiwan and its history. I was chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on East Asia, the Pacific and International Cybersecurity Policy, and have made at least 25 trips to Taiwan and have been invited as an observer to two of the nation’s presidential elections. Taiwan’s continuous economic miracle has seen the nation transition from a mixed agricultural-industrial society at the end of Japan’s 50 years of jurisdiction to today’s economic powerhouse, unmatched by most nations of the world. Just as outstanding has been Taiwan’s decades of resistance and