Your editorial (“Are they sending the Marines?” April 22, page 8) implies that the US is trying to “justify” its presence in the region by intentionally stoking cross-strait tensions by stationing marines in the new American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) complex.
While conspiracy theories and US bashing are always crowd pleasers, there is an alternative explanation: With the KMT and vice president-elect Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) throwing themselves at the feet of the Chinese Communist Party even before taking office, a symbolic upgrading of AIT into a real embassy sends the signal that US support for Taiwanese sovereignty remains steadfast.
The US has always supported a strong and confident Taiwan as critical to cross-strait peace. If there is any symbolic meaning to the timing of the AIT ad, it is not to stoke cross-strait tensions (please be serious), but to give Taiwan the confidence to continue to engage China economically.
Or, more probably, the pencil-pusher at the US State Department responsible for construction procurements is not an expert on the delicacies of cross-strait relations.
If the US really wanted to create cross-strait tension, it could just support Taiwan’s UN and WHO applications, which your editors think is such a great idea. After Taiwan is reduced to rubble in the ensuing war, the US could maintain its influence in the region by stationing as much military hardware as it pleased among the smoldering wreckage.
Peter Cranston
Washington
Testees left in the dark
The Steering Committee for the Test of Proficiency-Huayu (SC-TOP) was established by the Ministry of Education to develop and promote an effective Chinese assessment system, the Test of Proficiency-Huayu (TOP), for Chinese learners worldwide to assess their Chinese proficiency.
Unfortunately, SC-TOP does not provide the most basic of resources for test takers. There is only one mock test available for each level and the only word list consists of 8,000 words with no translations in any language. The words are listed in order of complexity and are useless for lower-level test takers.
China’s Hanyu Shuiping Kaoshi has word lists available for different levels.
TOP has been running since 2003. Why aren’t these resources available for TOP test takers?
Jeffrey Campbell
Lujhou, Taipei County
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS