Turning off the lights for one hour to observe Earth Day might eliminate one hour of lighting electricity consumption, but it also means that people have to stop working for that hour.
This can be done once, but it’s impossible to ask people to work in the dark for extended periods. However, it might be feasible if our buildings were designed with natural ventilation and lighting.
Many office buildings are closed structures with sealed windows, and people draw the curtains and turn on fluorescent lights to avoid the heat of direct sunlight.
In fact, simple sunshades with a Venetian blind design can both reduce the use of lights and allow sufficient light to enter. Many convenience stores or grocery stores use dozens of fluorescent lights during the day, raising indoor temperatures and increasing the use of air-conditioning.
It should be possible to reduce artificial lighting while retaining the same indoor brightness. Reducing unnecessary lights would be even more energy-efficient than installing energy-efficient light bulbs.
We should take a comprehensive approach to saving energy and reducing carbon emissions and distinguish symbolic measures from those that require long-term efforts and have long-term effect. While some measures require infrastructure improvements, other can be easily achieved through management or by being implemented in daily life.
For example, we could promote “green consumption,” calling on the public to use green products for basic life necessities, by shopping at “green stores” or staying at environmentally friendly hotels when traveling.
Corporations should also be able to procure green products for their daily necessities, from factory interiors down to office appliances.
The public is often unclear on how to be environmentally friendly. People who think they are protecting the environment often do things that have the opposite effect. One example is a group of students who collected recyclable waste and turned it into art creations to promote recycling, but later threw it away.
Many stores also sell a wide selection of so-called “energy-efficient products,” but these include bogus green products that confuse consumers. Product quality should not drop or prices go up just because a product is labeled a green product.
A while ago there was a detergent sold in simple and environmentally friendly packaging, but the price was higher than detergent in normal packaging.
Policies should be written to prevent similar incidents from reoccurring.
It is very important to build a rigorous certification system to help consumers distinguish certified from non-certified green products.
At present, there are already eco-friendly, energy-efficient, water-saving and green building material labeling schemes.
These schemes use scientific methods and third-party certification to select the most environmentally friendly and energy-efficient products. There are still a lot of products that haven’t yet been included in this system, but if the government and business sector understand this, it should be possible to build a public consensus to expand the scope of green products.
One day, when we cannot buy products without eco-labels and all our buildings are built with green materials, Taiwan will have become a low-carbon emission society. If we all work together, it should be possible to bring about a large reduction in per capita carbon dioxide emissions.
Chen Wen-ching is vice president of the Environment and Development Foundation.
Translated by Ted Yang
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS