The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has boasted recently about the steady stream of members joining its ranks thanks to a proposal to attract younger participants by party Chairman Frank Hsieh (謝長廷). But even as the party hailed its efforts, it seemed doubtful whether the DPP was ready to embrace new voices.
The decision to let younger members vote in next month’s chairmanship election — regardless of how long they have held membership — helped reel in more than 1,000 new members aged between 18 and 35 in just two weeks. The party aims to double that figure by the registration deadline this Friday.
This offered a needed boost of confidence for the DPP, as nothing could be more vital to a democratic party’s future than the ability to incorporate new talent, passion and vision.
The registration for candidacy in the race for the DPP chairmanship closed last Friday. Within a day, there was immediate talk that the party leadership should “coordinate” among the three contestants — former vice premier Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), Legislator Chai Trong-rong (蔡同榮) and former presidential adviser Koo Kwang-ming (辜寬敏).
Suddenly, the party’s serenade to youth seems less than sincere.
Some 1,200 new members enticed by the opportunity to help put the party back on its feet and select its next chief have every right to feel cheated if there is negotiation for a single candidate for the job. If that happens, the party’s leadership should not be surprised when many of its newfound torchbearers shake their heads in disgust and quickly lose interest in playing a “guiding role” in the party.
Not that it should come as a surprise if the DPP tries to “resolve” the chairmanship before the election on May 18. The party has cowered in the face of internal debate and competition before. The attempt at negotiations among the four candidates who vied for the presidential nomination is an example, as was the treatment of the party’s “11 bandits.” This group of outspoken DPP members, including former legislators Lee Wen-chung (李文忠) and Lin Cho-shui (林濁水), were blacklisted by a grassroots movement for their public criticism of the party.
Yet, the DPP has repeatedly prided itself on the ability to embrace differing opinions, encourage lively and heated debate within its ranks and come out stronger. As the party stands at a nadir, now is certainly the time to draw on such strengths.
The DPP’s series of eight introspective meetings drew to a close on Saturday — conferences that brought together party members, media and academics to pick at the party’s sores and offer candid diagnoses. Those meetings seem to have produced little in the way of a breakthrough. The key to cementing democratic progress — one of the party’s oft-touted goals — is intertwined with party culture and the DPP would do well to focus its reflections on this.
The party’s desire to maintain internal harmony to the point of pre-empting its own democratic mechanisms is disappointing. The DPP must find the confidence to believe that its ideals are not so fragile that a chairmanship election could break those bonds. Without this first step, it is unlikely to pull off the transformation and renewal it seeks.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
RSS