Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
Even if Ma's original statement -- since qualified with two conditions -- was a throwaway comment designed to make him sound tough on China ahead of tomorrow's presidential election, he should at least be commended for suggesting things that other governments around the world seem frightened even to mention.
Some of the criticism leveled at Ma -- such as that of Sports Affairs Council Chairman Yang Chung-ho (
Meanwhile, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Frank Hsieh's (
Does Hsieh mean that if he is elected president and China belittles Taiwan during the Games, he will not ask our athletes to come home?
Given its Olympic history, the oft-quoted chestnut that sports and politics don't mix does not apply to Taiwan. Taiwan was absent from the 1976 and 1980 Games because of interference from China, while the nation's Olympic flag and anthem are stark testimony to the sad reality that politics does spill into the stadium.
Add this to the fact that the Beijing Olympics amount to one big political exercise designed to celebrate the Chinese Communist Party's international clout, and one can only conclude that the saying is bunkum.
By criticizing Ma, the DPP chairman is being hypocritical. The decision made by the government to reject the Olympic torch route was entirely a political one.
It is odd to suggest that an athlete's personal desire to win a gold medal should take precedence over national interests and dignity. After all, the first thing most athletes do after claiming a gold medal is grab their national flag and celebrate with a lap of honor or other show.
Given the increasing stranglehold Beijing is placing on Taiwan in the international arena and its track record of meddling in even the most trivial events in an effort to quash Taiwan's international space, it is inevitable that the Chinese government will try to demean Taiwan in some fashion during the Games. Its actions may be highly visible and noticeable to the international community or may take the form of subtler attacks on Taiwan's sovereignty that will be apparent only to the Chinese-speaking world.
And if Beijing does try something, then the nation's athletes -- regardless of how many years of sweat and hard work they have put into training -- should not need to be told what to do by politicians; they should be on the first plane home before those in power have even had a chance to speak out.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS