To hear Ramon Gilsanz speak -- voice calm and measured, even on a day when travel plans are tied in a knot by a snowstorm -- you would never guess that he is being sued by thousands of people. And that does not count the man who is suing him on behalf of everyone in the US.
What did he do to deserve this?
Gilsanz, a structural engineer with a small firm in Manhattan, was one of the legions of people who just showed up downtown after the Sept. 11, 2001, attack to help. Some made sandwiches. Others dug. Gilsanz engineered.
The two colossal towers had been turned into 1.6 billion tonnes of rubble, piles that reached 12 stories high and eight stories deep. Buildings had partially collapsed. Any search for survivors would require heavy cranes set on treacherous ground. Someone had to figure out how and where to put them. Fragile walls had to be shored up.
Led by Gilsanz, a group of structural engineers talked their way past the barricades. They became indispensable in a world that suddenly had no recognizable geometry. Nine months later, the debris was cleared. Despite the fast pace and cruel terrain, no workers died because of structural failures or accidents during the recovery.
Now, however, thousands of people have filed lawsuits claiming that they became ill by breathing the air at the World Trade Center site while working on the recovery. Still others have sued not because they worked there, but because they had jobs in places where the debris was stored. They say the exposure made them sick.
Finally, one man has sued on behalf of the US, claiming that Gilsanz is part of a vast conspiracy to cover up the truth about Sept. 11, including the "so-called building failures." The lawsuit maintains that exotic weaponry actually destroyed the buildings, and that the airplanes were mass psychological trickery.
"When you are sued by 8,000 people, your mind works in a different way," Gilsanz, 53, said. "You totally disconnect. If you live on the West Coast, you can't always be thinking about earthquakes."
Gilsanz is one of about 130 structural engineers from 30 firms who have been named as defendants in an enormous cloud of litigation that drifts, year by year, through the federal court.
The engineers turned up at the trade center site as volunteers, but after a few days, the city established formal arrangements, and they were signed up as subcontractors.
"We did not want to get paid for this work, but we were told we had to be paid in order to participate," said Joseph Tortorella, a former president of the Structural Engineers Association who is also being sued. "Many of us ended up giving the money to charity."
Both Tortorella and Gilsanz say they had nothing to do with monitoring the air.
"Air quality is out of our realm as structural engineers," Gilsanz said. "We were in the same atmosphere, exposed to the same substances. I took the training with all the workers. Everyone was told to wear the respirator. It was hard."
A lawyer for many of the people suing, Paul Napoli, said the structural engineers should have made sure that other workers were protected from contaminants in the air. Anyone who directs workers has a duty under long-established labor law not to send them into unsafe conditions without protection, he said.
"They shirked their responsibility time and time again," Napoli said.
The structural engineers agree that people who got sick from working at the site ought to be compensated, but they say they were on hand simply to figure out if a spot was stable enough to work in. They were not in charge of bossing anyone around, said Glenn Fuerth, a lawyer retained by Gilsanz's professional liability insurers to defend him. He said it was still too early for the engineers to ask a judge to cut them loose because the lawsuit may be years from trial.
For his part, Gilsanz -- whose firm recently did the structural design for an exhibit of cars suspended from wires at the Guggenheim Museum -- has spent a great deal of time studying the failure of the buildings.
The collapse of the two towers and the building at 7 World Trade Center after being ravaged by fire provided vivid evidence, he said, that building codes had become too relaxed on fire protection. On Friday, he flew to California for a meeting of a national code group, intent on urging tougher requirements.
Whatever he does, the trade center lawsuits are likely to linger in his life as the event becomes an ever more distant memory.
"You try to pay as little attention as possible," Gilsanz said. "It's the only way to function."
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS