Following conflict and then compromise, the Cabinet finally sent the Cabinet Organizational Act (
Over the past three decades, numerous attempts to amend the act were stillborn, mainly because the ministries looked after their own interests. The Cabinet's administrative duties are complex and constantly changing and must be handled by specialized agencies. On the other hand, there are demands that structures, human resources and budgets be streamlined, and arguments for increasing or decreasing the budget are constantly being debated. In addition, officials in institutions or positions about to be merged have done everything in their power to keep the bill from passing.
Although the government and opposition reached a consensus on revising the act during the previous legislative session, the amendment was not completed and the process had to be repeated.
To keep the consensus alive, the Cabinet agreed to set up a human resources office for retired military personnel.
Several Cabinet members opposed the suggestion at last week's Cabinet meeting, but it was accepted following negotiations. The debate in the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) legislative caucus overturned a past suggestion that a ministry for retired military staff be established, instead proposing a ministry for national defense and retired military personnel.
The marine ministry that KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
It will be very difficult to pass the amendment because there is always someone who is not satisfied with the latest change. But this is a time of political uncertainty, which could be the best opportunity to pass the amendment. The Cabinet will resign, leaving vested interests with little power to block organizational changes. This serves to diminish pressure and facilitate discussion of the amendment based on the existing agreement.
Some people in Ma's camp and Democratic Progressive Party candidate Frank Hsieh's (
Even before taking up the presidency, South Korean president-elect Lee Myung-bak began streamlining the government and declared that the original 18 ministries would be streamlined to 13 ministries and two national commissions. He also appointed new Cabinet members.
After dozens of years of attempted reform, Taiwan's politicians are still busy promoting their own ideas. The difference in efficiency is telling.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to