The Taipei Times has not given prominent coverage on the developments in Kosovo that led to the proclamation of a new European state on Sunday. The international community has, however, paid close attention for years as it is connected with some of the most important issues facing the world today.
For example: Can foreign countries recognize Kosovo in view of UN Declaration 1244, which does not map out independence as an option? Is the moral right for independence based on the wish of a not ethnically homogeneous nation or on the brutal repression by the former Serbian government of Slobodan Milosevic?
Will the EU mission be handicapped by the lack of a new UN resolution? Will the EU's determination be hindered by the significant resistance of countries harboring breakaway movements within their borders? Is the contamination effect of Kosovo really so strong that Russia finds it necessary to actively support the radical movement in Serbia?
Does the Serbian government truly reflect the long term wishes of its people in taking the issue to each and every international forum?
Let's also take a look at the difficult next steps that some of the actors need to reflect on.
Can the international community work out a concept of limited sovereignty tailor-made to solve Kosovo's situation?
Will Kosovo's move be followed by Republika Srpska in Bosnia and will Montenegro recognize Kosovo?
The Republic of Kosovo is a child born under complicated circumstances. Certainly it is of concern to everyone interested in these key issues of national identity. I wish Taipei Times readers could be better briefed about all the complicated but interesting aspects of this unique development.
Bengt Johansson
Sweden
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
Former Japanese minister of defense Shigeru Ishiba has been elected as president of the governing Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and would be approved as prime minister in parliament today. Ishiba is a familiar face for Taiwanese, as he has visited the nation several times. His popularity among Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers has grown as a result of his multiple meetings and encounters with legislators and prominent figures in the government. The DPP and the LDP have close ties and have long maintained warm relations. Ishiba in August 2020 praised Taiwan’s
On Thursday last week, the International Crisis Group (ICG) issued a well-researched report titled “The Widening Schism across the Taiwan Strait,” which focused on rising tensions between Taiwan and China, making a number of recommendations on how to avoid conflict. While it is of course laudable that a respected international organization such as the ICG is willing to think through possible avenues toward a peaceful resolution, the report contains a couple of fundamental flaws in the way it approaches the issue. First, it attempts to present a “balanced approach” by pushing back equally against Taiwan’s perceived transgressions as against Beijing’s military threats
RSS